首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Food and Drug Administration vs European Medicines Agency: Review times and clinical evidence on novel drugs at the time of approval
【2h】

Food and Drug Administration vs European Medicines Agency: Review times and clinical evidence on novel drugs at the time of approval

机译:食品和药物管理局与欧洲药物局:在批准时审查时间和新药的临床证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) now have expedited review procedures for new drugs. We compared the review times of medicines licensed by the 2 agencies and explored differences in the evidence submitted. In 2015–2017 the FDA licensed 113 drugs, 66 of which reached Europe. The median review time was longer at the EMA than FDA and was shorter for drugs undergoing FDA‐expedited programmes compared to the same drugs approved by the EMA through the standard procedure. We identified differences regarding the evidence submitted to the 2 regulators for 7 drugs. The greater use of expedited programmes by the FDA and administrative time at the European Commission mainly explain the later access of new drugs to the European market. The additional evidence submitted to the EMA is generally scant and limited to a few drugs.
机译:食品和药物管理局(FDA)和欧洲药物局(EMA)现在加快了新药的审查程序。我们比较了2个机构许可的药物的审查时间,并探讨了提交的证据的差异。 2015 - 2017年,FDA授权113种药物,其中66名,其中66名到达欧洲。与EMA通过标准程序批准的相同药物相比,EMA的中位评审时间比FDA更长,而且较较短的药物较短。我们确定了有关提交给7个药物2个监管机构的证据的差异。在欧盟委员会的FDA和行政时间更广泛地利用加速计划主要解释后来进入欧洲市场的新药。提交给EMA的额外证据通常很少,并限于少量药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号