首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Geriatrics >Coverage of non-receipt of cash transfer (Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty) and associated factors among older persons in the Mampong Municipality Ghana – a quantitative analysis
【2h】

Coverage of non-receipt of cash transfer (Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty) and associated factors among older persons in the Mampong Municipality Ghana – a quantitative analysis

机译:非收到现金转让(扶贫)的覆盖范围和Mampong Municipality的老年人的相关因素加纳 - 定量分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Social assistance in the form of a cash transfer (CT) or in-kind has been recognised as a social protection strategy in tackling poverty and providing financial protection for individuals and households. Though social protection was missing under the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), it was recognised as a tool for alleviating poverty under the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Social protection is influential in achieving a wider range of development goals such as health, social inclusion and poverty reduction [1]. It is estimated that at least 45.0% of the world’s population benefits from one social protection programme or the other. As of 2015, about 71.0% of the world’s population had not received the full range of benefits stemming from child and family benefits to old-age pensions [2]. The origin of social protection interventions is attributed to the western world where its role in meeting the MDGs has been well documented in countries such as the United States, Britain and Germany [3]. In developing countries, social protection has gradually found its place on the developmental agenda, and the African continent is not excluded from the rise and institutionalisation of social protection across the various continents in the world. According to the African Union (AU), social protection is defined as “a “package“ of policies and programmes with the aim of reducing poverty and vulnerability of large segments of the population” [4]. Social protection policies include cash transfers. Despite the gradual increase and extent of social protection programmes across continents, only a small portion of these interventions address the needs of older persons [3].
机译:现金转让(CT)或实物形式的社会援助被认为是解决贫困和为个人和家庭提供金融保护的社会保护战略。虽然根据千年发展目标(MDG)缺少社会保护,但它被认为是在可持续发展目标(SDGS)下减轻贫困的工具。社会保护在实现更广泛的发展目标方面有影响力,如健康,社会包容和减贫[1]。据估计,世界上至少有45.0%的人口从一个社会保护计划或另一个人口受益。截至2015年,世界上大约71.0%的人口尚未收到来自儿童和家庭益处的全部福利对养老养老金[2]。社会保护干预措施的起源归因于西方世界,在千年发展目标的举办中的作用,在美国,英国和德国(德国)(如美国)的国家已经充分了解。在发展中国家,社会保护逐步找到了发展议程的地方,非洲大陆并不排除在世界各大陆的社会保护的兴起和制度化之外。根据非洲联盟(AU),社会保护被定义为“一揽子计划”政策和方案,旨在减少人口大部分的贫困和脆弱性“[4]。社会保护政策包括现金转移。尽管各大洲的社会保护方案逐步增加和程度,但这些干预措施的一小部分地解决了老年人的需求[3]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号