首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Advances in Nutrition >The Water Footprint of Diets: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【2h】

The Water Footprint of Diets: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:饮食的水脚印:全球系统审查和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Agricultural water requirements differ between foods. Population-level dietary preferences are therefore a major determinant of agricultural water use. The “water footprint” (WF) represents the volume of water consumed in the production of food items, separated by water source; blue WF represents ground and surface water use, and green WF represents rain water use. We systematically searched for published studies using the WF to assess the water use of diets. We used the available evidence to quantify the WF of diets in different countries, and grouped diets in patterns according to study definition. “Average” patterns equated to those currently consumed, whereas “healthy” patterns included those recommended in national dietary guidelines. We searched 7 online databases and identified 41 eligible studies that reported the dietary green WF, blue WF, or total WF (green plus blue) (1964 estimates for 176 countries). The available evidence suggests that, on average, European (170 estimates) and Oceanian (18 estimates) dietary patterns have the highest green WFs (median per capita: 2999 L/d and 2924 L/d, respectively), whereas Asian dietary patterns (98 estimates) have the highest blue WFs (median: 382 L/d per capita). Foods of animal origin are major contributors to the green WFs of diets, whereas cereals, fruits, nuts, and oils are major contributors to the blue WF of diets. “Healthy” dietary patterns (425 estimates) had green WFs that were 5.9% (95% CI: −7.7, −4.0) lower than those of “average” dietary patterns, but they did not differ in their blue WFs. Our review suggests that changes toward healthier diets could reduce total water use of agriculture, but would not affect blue water use. Rapid dietary change and increasing water security concerns underscore the need for a better understanding of the amount and type of water used in food production to make informed policy decisions.
机译:农业用水要求在食物之间有所不同。因此,人口级饮食偏好是农业用水的主要决定因素。 “水脚印”(WF)代表食品生产中消耗的水量,由水源分开;蓝色WF代表地面和地表用水,绿色WF代表雨水使用。我们系统地搜索了使用WF的发布研究,以评估饮食的用水。我们使用可用的证据来量化不同国家的饮食的WF,并根据研究定义对模式进行了分组的饮食。 “平均”模式等同于目前消耗的人,而“健康”模式包括在国家膳食指南中推荐的那些。我们搜索了7个在线数据库,并确定了41项报告饮食绿色WF,蓝色WF或全WF(绿色加蓝)(1964个国家估计)的符合条件的研究。可用证据表明,平均而言,欧洲(170次估计)和大洋洲(18次估计)饮食模式具有最高的绿色WFS(人均中位数:2999 L / D和2924 L / D,而亚洲饮食模式( 98估计)具有最高的蓝色WFS(中位数:382 L / D人均)。动物来源的食物是绿色饮食绿色WFS的主要贡献者,而谷物,水果,坚果和油是饮食蓝色WF的主要贡献者。 “健康”饮食模式(425估计)具有比“平均”饮食模式低5.9%(95%CI:-7.7,-4.0)的绿色WFS,但它们在其蓝色WFS中没有不同。我们的评论表明,对健康饮食的变化可以减少农业的总用水,但不会影响蓝用水。快速饮食变化和日益增长的水安全问题强调了更好地了解粮食生产中使用的水量和类型,以提出知情的政策决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号