首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Placebo Effect of Caffeine on Maximal Strength and Strength Endurance in Healthy Recreationally Trained Women Habituated to Caffeine
【2h】

Placebo Effect of Caffeine on Maximal Strength and Strength Endurance in Healthy Recreationally Trained Women Habituated to Caffeine

机译:咖啡因对健康休闲训练妇女的最大力量和力量耐力的安慰剂作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: By using deceptive experimental designs, several investigations have observed that trained individuals may increase their performance when told they were given caffeine, when in fact they received a placebo (i.e., the placebo effect of caffeine). However, most of these investigations on the placebo effect of caffeine used individuals with low caffeine consumption or did not report habitual caffeine consumption, especially in studies analyzing resistance-based exercise. Hence, it is unknown if habitual caffeine consumers benefit from the placebo effect of caffeine on exercise performance. Thus, the aim of the present study was to analyze the placebo effect of caffeine on maximal strength and strength-endurance performance during the bench press exercise (BP) in women with mild–moderate daily consumption of caffeine. Methods: Thirteen resistance-trained women (BP one-repetition maximum (1RM) = 40.0 ± 9.7 kg) habituated to caffeine (4.1 ± 1.7 mg/kg/day) completed a deceptive randomized experimental design with two experimental trials. On one occasion, participants were told that they would receive 6 mg/kg of caffeine but received a placebo (PLAC), and on other occasions, participants did not receive any substance and were told that this was a control situation (CONT). In each experimental trial, participants underwent a 1RM BP test and a strength-endurance test consisting of performing the maximal number of repetitions at 50% of their 1RM. Results: In comparison to CONT, PLAC did not enhance 1RM (40.0 ± 10.5 kg vs. 41.0 ± 9.5 kg, respectively; p = 0.10), nor did it enhance the number of repetitions (32.2 ± 5.1 vs. 31.8 ± 4.5; p = 0.66) or mean power (130 ± 34 vs. 121 ± 26; p = 0.08) in the strength-endurance test. Conclusion: Informing participants that they were given caffeine, when in fact they received a placebo, did not modify any performance variable measured in this investigation. Thus, the use of the placebo effect of caffeine seemed an ineffective strategy to enhance muscle strength and strength endurance during the BP exercise in women with mild–moderate consumption of caffeine.
机译:背景技术:通过使用欺骗性的实验设计,几次调查已经观察到训练有素的人在被告知他们被给予咖啡因时可能会增加他们的表现,当时他们收到安慰剂(即咖啡因的安慰剂效应)。然而,大多数关于咖啡因的安慰剂效应的大部分调查使用具有低咖啡因消费的个体或未报告习惯性咖啡因消费,特别是在分析基于抵抗的运动的研究中。因此,如果习惯性咖啡因消费者的利益来自咖啡因对运动表现的安慰剂影响是未知的。因此,本研究的目的是分析咖啡因对咖啡因较为温和的咖啡因的妇女替补型锻炼(BP)期间最大强度和强度耐力性能的安慰剂作用。方法:训练有素的三十次耐受培养的女性(BP一重复(1RM)= 40.0±9.7千克)习惯于咖啡因(4.1±1.7mg / kg /天)完成了两种实验试验的欺骗随机实验设计。有一次,参与者被告知他们会收到6毫克/千克的咖啡因,但收到安慰剂(PLAC),在其他场合,参与者没有收到任何物质,并被告知这是一个控制状况(续)。在每个实验试验中,参与者接受了1RM BP测试和强度耐久性测试,包括在其1RM的50%下进行最大重复。结果:与续相比,PACT分别没有增强1RM(分别40.0±10.5千克,分别; P = 0.10),也没有增强重复次数(32.2±5.1与31.8±4.5; p = 0.66)或平均功率(130±34伏121±26; P = 0.08)。结论:告知参与者他们被给予咖啡因,事实上他们收到了一个安慰剂,没有修改在该调查中测量的任何性能变量。因此,使用咖啡因的安慰剂效应似乎是一种无效的策略,以提高患有轻度 - 中等消耗咖啡因的女性BP运动期间的肌肉力量和力量耐久性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号