首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pharmacy: Journal of Pharmacy Education and Practice >Self-Instruction Video Versus Face-to-Face Instruction of Pharmacy Students’ Skills in Blood Pressure Measurement
【2h】

Self-Instruction Video Versus Face-to-Face Instruction of Pharmacy Students’ Skills in Blood Pressure Measurement

机译:自我指令视频与药房学生的面对面指导血压测量中的技能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A modern approach to clinical skill education is the use of educational videos, yet there is a shortage of literature investigating the effect of self-instruction videos (SIVs) in pharmacy students. Therefore, our objective was to investigate whether an SIV is non-inferior compared to face-to-face instruction (FTFI) in acquiring blood pressure measurement skills. The participants in this randomized controlled study were pharmacy students. The control group was taught by FTFI, while the intervention group watched an SIV. Before and after the instruction, the participants’ performance was assessed by an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). The participants completed a self-assessment survey before each OSCE session. Moreover, the participants’ perception and satisfaction were assessed using another survey. The OSCE score and self-assessment score increased significantly from pre- to post-instruction in both groups. The SIV was non-inferior compared to FTFI in terms of the OSCE score, considering a predefined non-inferiority margin of −10%. The participants’ self-assessment yielded inconclusive results for non-inferiority. Both instructional approaches were well received. Considering our findings, SIVs might be a valuable option for teaching pharmacy students’ blood pressure measurement skills. However, depending on the skill intended to be taught, a combination of an instructional video with instructor-led teaching may be necessary.
机译:一种现代临床技能教育的方法是使用教育视频,但文学缺乏调查药房学生的自我教育视频(SIV)的影响。因此,我们的目标是研究SIV是否与面对面指令(FTFI)相比是非较低的,以获取血压测量技能。该随机对照研究中的参与者是药房学生。对照组由FTFI教授,而干预组观看了一个SIV。在教学之前和之后,参与者的表现是通过客观结构化的临床检查(欧安组织)进行评估。参与者在每个欧安组织会议之前完成了自我评估调查。此外,使用另一个调查评估参与者的感知和满足感。欧安组织评分和自我评估得分显着从两组的前指令中显着增加。与欧安组织评分的FTFI相比,SIV是非较低的,考虑到预定的非劣势裕度为-10%。参与者的自我评估产生了不逊断的不确定结果。这两种教学方法都得到了很好的接受。考虑到我们的调查结果,SIV可能是教学学生血压测量技能的有价值选择。然而,取决于要教导的技能,可能需要具有教师LED教学的教学视频的组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号