首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pharmacology Research Perspectives >Intervention by clinical pharmacists can improve blood glucose fluctuation in patients with diabetes and acute myocardial infarction: A propensity score‐matched analysis
【2h】

Intervention by clinical pharmacists can improve blood glucose fluctuation in patients with diabetes and acute myocardial infarction: A propensity score‐matched analysis

机译:临床药剂师的干预可以改善糖尿病患者的血糖波动和急性心肌梗死:倾向分数匹配分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Acute phase hyperglycemia and exaggerated glucose fluctuation may be associated with poor outcomes in diabetic patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to determine whether intervention by clinical pharmacists can mitigate blood glucose and glucose fluctuations in these fragile patients. This retrospective study enrolled patients with diabetes and AMI, from 1 January 2019 to 30 June 2020 in our institution. Blood glucose and glucose fluctuations were calculated before and after the pharmacist's intervention and between patients who underwent intervention and those who did not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the impact of patient characteristics on the results. A total of 170 patients were included in our primary analysis, including 29 patients who received the pharmacist intervention and 141 patients who did not. After the pharmacist's intervention, blood glucose (fasting blood glucose‐FBG, from 11.9 to 9.8; postprandial blood glucose‐PBG, from 15.3 to 13.2; mean blood glucose‐BG, 14.5 to 12.3 mmol/L; p < .001), and glucose fluctuations (standard deviation of blood glucose‐SDBG, from 3.8 to 3.0, mmol/L, p = .005) were significantly improved. Before PSM, no clear effects were found in intervention versus nonintervention patients, in terms of blood glucose and glucose fluctuation indicators, except for FBG (9.3 vs. 8.0. mmol/L, p = .005). Further analysis indicated a high incidence of FBG <7.8 mmol/L in nonintervention versus intervention patients (51.5% vs. 27.6%, p = .003). After PSM, a significant reduction in blood glucose fluctuation (SDBG, 3.0 vs. 4.1, p = .031; PBGE, 2.1 vs. 4.1, p = .017; LAGE, 4.7 vs. 7.2, mmol/L, p = .004), and PBG (11.1 vs. 13.0, mmol/L, p = .048) was observed in the intervention group than in the nonintervention group. The clinical pharmacist intervention contributed to improved outcomes, specifically, in reducing blood glucose fluctuations and potential hypoglycemia risk.
机译:急性期高血糖和夸张的葡萄糖波动可能与急性心肌梗死(AMI)后糖尿病患者的差的结果相关。本研究旨在确定临床药剂师的干预是否可以减轻这些脆弱患者的血糖和葡萄糖波动。该回顾性研究从2019年1月1日至2020年6月30日在我们的机构中​​注册了糖尿病患者和AMI。在药剂师的干预之前和之后计算血糖和葡萄糖波动,并且在接受干预的患者和没有的患者之间。倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于降低患者特征对结果的影响。我们的主要分析中共有170名患者,其中包括29名接受药剂师干预的患者,141名患者没有。在药剂师的干预后,血糖(空腹血糖-CBG,从11.9至9.8;餐后血糖-PBG,15.3至13.2;平均血糖-Bg,14.5至12.3mmol / L; p <.001),和葡萄糖波动(血糖-SDBG的标准偏差为3.8至3.0,MMOL / L,P = .005)得到了显着改善。在PSM之前,在血糖和葡萄糖波动指标方面没有发现干预效果,除了FBG(9.3与8.0.mmol / L,P = .005)。进一步的分析表明,在不合施与干预患者中,FBG <7.8mmol / L的高发病率(51.5%与27.6%,p = .003)。 PSM后,血糖波动的显着降低(SDBG,3.0对4.1,P = .031; PBGE,2.1和4.1,P = .017; leage,4.7与7.2,Mmol / L,P = .004 )在干预组中观察到PBG(11.1 vs.13.0,mmol / l,p = .048)。临床药剂师的干预有助于改善的结果,具体地,在减少血糖波动和潜在的低血糖风险中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号