首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Soft Tissue Mobilization and Stretching for Shoulder in CrossFitters: A Randomized Pilot Study
【2h】

Soft Tissue Mobilization and Stretching for Shoulder in CrossFitters: A Randomized Pilot Study

机译:软组织动员和肩部伸展用于交叉配合器:随机试验研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. The shoulder in CrossFit should have a balance between mobility and stability. Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and posterior shoulder stiffness are risk factors for overhead shoulder injury. Objective. To determine the effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and horizontal adduction stretch in CrossFit practitioners’ shoulders. Methods: Twenty-one regular CrossFitters were allocated to experimental (stretching with isometric contraction and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization) or control groups (instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization). Each session lasted 5 min, 2 days a week, over a period of 4 weeks. Shoulder internal rotation and horizontal adduction (digital inclinometer), as well as posterior shoulder stretch perception (Park scale), were evaluated. Shapiro–Wilk test was used to analyze the distribution of the sample. Parametric Student’s t-test was used to obtain the intragroup differences. The inter- and intra-rater differences were calculated using a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results. Average age was 30.81 years (SD: 5.35), with an average height of 178 (SD: 7.93) cm and average weight of 82.69 (SD: 10.82) kg. Changes were found in the experimental group following intervention (p < 0.05), and when comparing baseline and follow-up assessments (p < 0.05) in all variables. Significant differences were found in the control group following intervention (p < 0.05), in right horizontal adduction and left internal rotation. When comparing the perception of internal rotation and horizontal adduction in both groups, significant differences were found. Conclusions. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization can improve shoulder horizontal adduction and internal rotation. An instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization technique yields the same results alone as those achieved in combination with post-isometric stretch with shoulder adduction.
机译:背景。 CrossFit的肩部应该在移动性和稳定性之间进行平衡。 Glenohumeral内部旋转赤字和后肩刚度是架空肩部损伤的危险因素。客观的。确定Crossfit从业者肩部仪器辅助软组织动员和水平内限伸展的有效性。方法:分配二十一常规交联剂以实验(用等轴承收缩和仪器辅助软组织侦察)或对照组(仪器辅助软组织侦察)。每次会议持续5分钟,每周2天,在4周内。肩部内部旋转和横向收缩(数字倾斜度计)以及后肩部拉伸感知(Park Scale)进行评估。 Shapiro-Wilk测试用于分析样品的分布。参数学学生的T检验用于获得Intragrous差异。使用反复措施的方差分析(ANOVA)来计算帧内间差异。结果。平均年龄为30.81岁(SD:5.35),平均高度为178(SD:7.93)厘米,平均重量为82.69(SD:10.82)Kg。在干预后的实验组(P <0.05)中发现了变化,以及在所有变量中比较基线和后续评估(P <0.05)。在干预后对照组(P <0.05),右侧水平内部旋转和左内部旋转中发现显着差异。在比较两组内旋转和水平增加的情况下,发现了显着的差异。结论。仪器辅助软组织动员可以改善肩部水平内部内部旋转。仪器辅助软组织摩擦技术单独产生相同的结果,因为与肩部内进相结合的组合实现的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号