首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Dentistry Journal >Diagnostic Value of Fluorescence Methods Visual Inspection and Photographic Visual Examination in Initial Caries Lesion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Diagnostic Value of Fluorescence Methods Visual Inspection and Photographic Visual Examination in Initial Caries Lesion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:初始龋病病变中荧光方法目视检查和摄影视觉检查的诊断价值:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy of fluorescence-based methods, visual inspections, and photographic visual examinations in initial caries detection. A literature search was undertaken in the PubMed and Cochrane databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and eligible articles published from 1 January 2009 to 30 October 2019 were included if they met the following criteria: they (1) assessed the accuracy of methods of detecting initial tooth caries lesions on occlusal, proximal, or smooth surfaces in both primary and permanent teeth (in clinical); (2) used a reference standard; (3) reported data regarding the sample size, prevalence of initial tooth caries, and accuracy of the methods. Data collection and extraction, quality assessment, and data analysis were conducted according to Cochrane standards Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 14.0. A total of 12 eligible articles were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of fluorescence-based methods were 80% and 80%, respectively; visual inspection was measured at 80% and 75%, respectively; photographic visual examination was measured at 67% and 79%, respectively. We found that the visual method and the fluorescence method were reliable for laboratory use to detect early-stage caries with equivalent accuracy.
机译:这种系统审查和荟萃分析旨在调查荧光的方法,目视检查和摄影视角在初始龋病检测中的功效。在PubMed和Cochrane数据库中进行了文献搜索。首选的系统审查和荟萃分析报告项目(PRISMA)准则遵循,如果符合以下标准,则包括从2009年1月1日至10月30日发布的符合条件的制度:(1)评估检测初始方法的准确性牙齿龋齿在主要和永久性牙齿(在临床上)的咬合,近端或光滑表面上; (2)使用参考标准; (3)报告了关于样品大小,初始牙齿患病率的数据,以及方法的准确性。根据诊断准确性研究-2的Cochrane标准评估进行数据收集和提取,质量评估和数据分析。使用审查经理5.3和Stata 14.0进行统计分析。在META分析中共有12件符合条件的文章。结果表明,荧光的方法的敏感性和特异性分别为80%和80%;目视检查分别以80%和75%测量;摄影视觉检查分别以67%和79%测量。我们发现,视觉方法和荧光法可用于实验室使用,以检测具有等效精度的早期龋齿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号