首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Developments in Nutrition >Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer
【2h】

Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer

机译:使用Google™搜索引擎进行健康信息:有问题吗?案例研究:癌症补充剂

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We assessed the quality of online health and nutrition information using a Google™ search on “supplements for cancer”. Search results were scored using the Health Information Quality Index (HIQI), a quality-rating tool consisting of 12 objective criteria related to website domain, lack of commercial aspects, and authoritative nature of the health and nutrition information provided. Possible scores ranged from 0 (lowest) to 12 (“perfect” or highest quality). After eliminating irrelevant results, the remaining 160 search results had median and mean scores of 8. One-quarter of the results were of high quality (score of 10–12). There was no correlation between high-quality scores and early appearance in the sequence of search results, where results are presumably more visible. Also, 496 advertisements, over twice the number of search results, appeared. We conclude that the Google™ search engine may have shortcomings when used to obtain information on dietary supplements and cancer.
机译:我们使用Google™搜索“癌症补充剂”评估了在线健康和营养信息的质量。搜索结果采用健康信息质量指数(HIQI),是由12个与网站领域的目标标准组成的质量评级工具,提供的商业方面,以及所提供的健康和营养信息的权威性质。可能的分数范围为0(最低)到12(“完美”或最高质量)。在消除不相关的结果后,其余160个搜索结果的中位数和平均得分为8.一季度的结果高质量(10-12分)。在搜索结果的序列中,高质量评分与早期外观之间没有相关性,在其中结果可能更加可见。此外,出现了496个广告,超过了搜索结果数量的两倍。我们得出结论,Google™搜索引擎在用于获得有关膳食补充剂和癌症的信息时可能具有缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号