首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Endoscopic polypectomy performed in clinic for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: study protocol for the EPIC multicentre randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Endoscopic polypectomy performed in clinic for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: study protocol for the EPIC multicentre randomised controlled trial

机译:在患有鼻息肉的慢性鼻窦炎的临床内窥镜核切除术:史诗多期面随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is common, with a Canadian prevalence of 5%, and associated with significant morbidity. Understandably, CRS impairs workplace productivity but that productivity substantially increases following surgical treatment. CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), the most common type of CRS, is usually treated with a combination of medications and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Historically, surgical treatment has only been performed in the operating room at a cost of about $C3500. However, recent studies have shown that a de-escalated procedure, endoscopic polypectomy performed in clinic (EPIC), can provide an improvement in patient symptoms to levels equal to those for ESS. Moreover, EPIC has additional proposed advantages including shorter recovery time, significantly lower cost to the healthcare system and shorter wait time for the patient. There is currently insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the superiority of polypectomy or ESS for the management of CRSwNP.
机译:慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)是常见的,加拿大患病率为5%,与显着的发病率相关。可以理解的是,CRS削弱了工作场所的工作效率,但在手术治疗后生产力显着增加。具有鼻息肉(CRSWNP)的CRS,最常见的CR类,通常用药物和内镜窦外科(ESS)的组合治疗。从历史上看,手术治疗仅在手术室中以大约C3500的成本进行。然而,最近的研究表明,在临床(EPIC)中进行的去升级程序,内镜核切除术可以提供患者症状的改善,与ESS等于那些。此外,EPIC具有额外的提出优点,包括较短的恢复时间,对医疗保健系统的成本显着降低,并且患者的等待时间较短。目前有足够的证据可以得出关于果胶切除术的优越性的结论或用于管理CRSWNP的ESS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号