首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antibiotics >Exploring Farmers’ Reasons for Antibiotic Use and Misuse in Pig Farms in Brazil
【2h】

Exploring Farmers’ Reasons for Antibiotic Use and Misuse in Pig Farms in Brazil

机译:探索农民在巴西养猪场抗生素使用和滥用的原因

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Stressful management that makes farmed pigs susceptible to infections is associated with high antibiotic use (AMU) and resistance (AMR). Pig farmers are key stakeholders to support the international agenda pushing AMU restrictions. We interviewed 58 pig farmers on AMU/AMR, biosecurity, veterinary assistance, disease prevention and treatment, aiming to understand practices and attitudes towards the AMU/AMR problem. Farmers described a reliance on antibiotics to prevent and treat disease while neglecting biosecurity measures. We identified inappropriate AMU practices (high use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, incorrect dosage or treatment length) and unrestricted access to antibiotics, which encouraged imprudent AMU. Nevertheless, most farmers considered this AMU legitimate to guarantee herd productivity and showed unpreparedness and resistance to changing AMU practices, perceiving limitations (economic, sanitary and inspection) more easily than alternatives to reduce AMU. Agro-industries and foreign markets were mentioned, and internal consumers dismissed as potential motivators for behavioral changes. Importantly, farmers’ economic, technical and social factors may limit their autonomy to change practices. We conclude that the observed distancing of pig farmers from the AMU/AMR problem limits the efficiency of policies aiming for a prudent AMU. Our study indicates a need for education, training and behavior change nudging that should include other stakeholders beyond farmers.
机译:使养殖猪容易感染的养殖猪有压力的管理与高抗生素使用(AMU)和抗性(AMR)有关。猪农是支持国际议程推动AMU限制的主要利益相关者。我们采访了AMU / AMR,生物安全,兽医援助,疾病预防和治疗的58名猪农民,旨在了解对AMU / AMR问题的实践和态度。农民描述了依赖于抗生素预防和治疗疾病,同时忽视生物安全措施。我们确定了不适当的AMU实践(高使用广谱抗生素,不正确的剂量或治疗长度),并不受限制地获得抗生素,这鼓励不谨慎的AMU。尽管如此,大多数农民都认为这一阿莫斯能够保证畜牧业生产力,并表现出毫不准备和抵制变化的AMU实践,感知局限性(经济,卫生和检查)比减少AMU的替代方案更容易。提及农业工业和国外市场,内部消费者被视为行为变革的潜在动机。重要的是,农民经济,技术和社会因素可能会限制自主权来改变做法。我们得出结论,从AMU / AMR问题中观察到猪农民的偏差限制了旨在审慎AMU的政策效率。我们的研究表明需要教育,培训和行为变化,努力包括其他超越农民的其他利益攸关方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号