首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI >Are Dual-Purpose Chickens Twice as Good? Measuring Performance and Animal Welfare throughout the Fattening Period
【2h】

Are Dual-Purpose Chickens Twice as Good? Measuring Performance and Animal Welfare throughout the Fattening Period

机译:两用鸡是两倍的两倍?在整个育肥期间测量性能和动物福利

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Dual-purpose chickens and native chicken breeds have gained public interest and their agricultural use has increased. Furthermore, the fattening of so-called “brother cockerels” of laying hens has been periodically discussed, with an increasing number of questions raised about their high feed consumption and low fleshiness and, therefore, low sustainability. This study carefully examines chickens—native, hybrid dual-purpose, and layer lines—to assess their performance in meat production, in addition to animal-based welfare indicators and sampling methods. Compared to modern broilers, tested alternatives gain less meat, consume more food, and need a longer fattening period. However, advantages may still exist in terms of animal welfare and with regard to ethically justifiable animal production in the future. Of the three alternatives tested, dual-purpose hybrids may be suitable for niche production, but further research is needed on economically sound feed management and adapted breeding strategies for dual-purpose chickens.
机译:两用鸡和本土鸡品种已经获得了公共利益,其农业使用增加了。此外,已经定期讨论了铺设母鸡的所谓“兄弟”的育肥,越来越多的饲料消耗和低血肉性以及低可持续性问题。本研究仔细检查了鸡天然,混合的两用目的和层线 - 以评估其在肉类生产中的性能,以及基于动物的福利指示器和采样方法。与现代肉鸡相比,测试的替代品较少肉,消耗更多食物,需要更长的育肥时间。然而,在动物福利方面仍然存在优势,并在未来的道德合理的动物生产方面存在。在测试的三种替代方案中,两用杂种可能适用于利基生产,但需要进一步研究经济的良好饲料管理和适应的两用鸡育种策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号