首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Translational Research >The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate versus propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a multicentered randomized positive-controlled phase III clinical trial
【2h】

The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate versus propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a multicentered randomized positive-controlled phase III clinical trial

机译:Remimazolam Tosylate与异丙酚对接受结肠镜检查的疗效和安全性:多元随机阳性控制III期临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate versus propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy. In this multicentered, blinded, randomized, active-controlled, non-inferior phase III trial, 384 eligible patients who were about to undergo colonoscopy were randomized as a ratio of 1:1 into remimazolam and propofol group. Procedure success was assessed and defined as the completion of colonoscopy without administration of rescue sedative agent or more than 5 top-ups of trial drug in any 15 minute-period after initial administration of trial drug. Sedation quality was evaluated by Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded. Procedure success rate was 96.91% (188/194) in remimazolam group and 100% (190/190) in propofol group, and the difference in rate was -3.09% with 95% confidence interval (CI) of -5.53%~-0.66%. Since the lower limit of 95% CI was greater than the non-inferiority margin of -8.00%, the efficacy of remimazolam tosylate was non-inferior to propofol. Besides, induction time of sedation was increased ( <0.001), while hypotension and respiratory depression was decreased in remimazolam group compared to propofol group; however, time to fully alert ( >0.05) or time to discharge ( >0.05) were unchanged. For safety assessment, total treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased in remimazolam group compared to propofol group ( <0.001); specifically, administration site pain ( <0.001), increased bilirubin ( =0.019), decreased respiratory rate ( <0.001) and decreased SpO ( <0.001) were less frequent in remimazolam group compared with propofol group. In conclusion, remimazolam tosylate is non-inferior in sedation efficacy while safer than propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
机译:本研究旨在评估Remimazolam Tosylate与异丙酚对接受结肠镜检查的疗效和安全性。在这种多元的,盲,随机,主动控制的非劣疫期III试验中,384名即将接受结肠镜检查的符合条件的患者被随机分配为Remimazolam和异丙酚组的比例为1:1。程序取得成功并定义为结肠镜检查的完成,而不在初始试验试验后的任何15分钟内携带救援镇静剂或超过5种试验药物。通过修改的观察者对警觉性/镇静评分评估评估镇静质量。记录治疗紧急不良事件。程序成功率为96.91%(188/194),在Remimazolam组中,100%(190/190)在异丙酚组中,其差异为-3.09%,95%置信区间(CI)为-5.53%〜-0.66 %。由于95%CI的下限大于非劣率裕度-8.00%,因此Remimazolam甲磺酸盐的功效是非较差的。此外,镇静的诱导时间升高(<0.001),而与异丙唑基团,Remimazolam组中低血压和呼吸抑制减少;但是,时间达到完全警报(> 0.05)或排出时间(> 0.05)。对于安全评估,与异丙酚组(<0.001)相比,Remimazolam组中的总治疗急性不良事件减少;具体而言,给药位点疼痛(<0.001),胆红素增加(= 0.019),降低呼吸速率(<0.001),与丙唑胺组中的呼吸速率降低(<0.001)减少频率较小。总之,Remimazolam Tosylate在接受结肠镜检查的患者中比类异丙酚更柔软。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号