首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Biomolecules >The Development of a Skin Cancer Classification System for Pigmented Skin Lesions Using Deep Learning
【2h】

The Development of a Skin Cancer Classification System for Pigmented Skin Lesions Using Deep Learning

机译:深入学习的着色皮肤病患者皮肤癌分类系统的发展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent studies have demonstrated the usefulness of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify images of melanoma, with accuracies comparable to those achieved by dermatologists. However, the performance of a CNN trained with only clinical images of a pigmented skin lesion in a clinical image classification task, in competition with dermatologists, has not been reported to date. In this study, we extracted 5846 clinical images of pigmented skin lesions from 3551 patients. Pigmented skin lesions included malignant tumors (malignant melanoma and basal cell carcinoma) and benign tumors (nevus, seborrhoeic keratosis, senile lentigo, and hematoma/hemangioma). We created the test dataset by randomly selecting 666 patients out of them and picking one image per patient, and created the training dataset by giving bounding-box annotations to the rest of the images (4732 images, 2885 patients). Subsequently, we trained a faster, region-based CNN (FRCNN) with the training dataset and checked the performance of the model on the test dataset. In addition, ten board-certified dermatologists (BCDs) and ten dermatologic trainees (TRNs) took the same tests, and we compared their diagnostic accuracy with FRCNN. For six-class classification, the accuracy of FRCNN was 86.2%, and that of the BCDs and TRNs was 79.5% ( = 0.0081) and 75.1% ( < 0.00001), respectively. For two-class classification (benign or malignant), the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 91.5%, 83.3%, and 94.5% by FRCNN; 86.6%, 86.3%, and 86.6% by BCD; and 85.3%, 83.5%, and 85.9% by TRN, respectively. False positive rates and positive predictive values were 5.5% and 84.7% by FRCNN, 13.4% and 70.5% by BCD, and 14.1% and 68.5% by TRN, respectively. We compared the classification performance of FRCNN with 20 dermatologists. As a result, the classification accuracy of FRCNN was better than that of the dermatologists. In the future, we plan to implement this system in society and have it used by the general public, in order to improve the prognosis of skin cancer.
机译:最近的研究已经证明了卷积神经网络(CNN)对黑素瘤图像分类的有用性,其具有与皮肤科医生实现的精度相当的精度。然而,迄今为止,在临床图像分类任务中,仅在临床图像分类任务中培训的CNN培训的性能尚未涉及皮肤病学竞争中的临床摄影任务。在这项研究中,我们从3551名患者提取了5846个色素皮肤病病的临床图像。着色的皮肤病变包括恶性肿瘤(恶性黑色素瘤和基础细胞癌)和良性肿瘤(痣,塞培,乳头角膜病,老年熊犬和血肿/血管瘤)。我们通过随机选择了666名患者创建了测试数据集,并根据患者挑选一个图像,并通过向其他图像提供边界盒注释来创建训练数据集(4732张图片,2885名患者)。随后,我们使用训练数据集接受了更快的基于区域的CNN(FRCNN),并在测试数据集中检查了模型的性能。此外,十个板认证的皮肤科医生(BCD)和10名皮肤科学员(TRNS)采取了相同的测试,我们将其与FRCNN进行了诊断准确性。对于六级分类,FRCNN的准确性为86.2%,BCD和TRNS的精度分别为79.5%(= 0.0081)和75.1%(<0.00001)。对于两班分类(良性或恶性),FRCNN的准确性,敏感性和特异性为91.5%,83.3%和94.5%; BCD 86.6%,86.3%和86.6%;分别为85.3%,83.5%和85.9%(Trn)。假阳性率和阳性预测值分别为5.5%,13.4%和70.5%,分别为14.1%和68.5%的55%和84.7%。我们将FRCNN的分类性能与20位皮肤科医生进行了比较。结果,FRCNN的分类精度优于皮肤科医生的分类精度。在未来,我们计划在社会中实施这个系统,并被公众使用,以改善皮肤癌的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号