首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Remote Sensing Data in a Tropical Environment
【2h】

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Remote Sensing Data in a Tropical Environment

机译:使用机器学习算法和热带环境中的遥感数据的滑坡易感性映射

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We used AdaBoost (AB), alternating decision tree (ADTree), and their combination as an ensemble model (AB-ADTree) to spatially predict landslides in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. The models were trained with a database of 152 landslides compiled using Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry, Google Earth images, and field surveys, and 17 conditioning factors (slope, aspect, elevation, distance to road, distance to river, proximity to fault, road density, river density, normalized difference vegetation index, rainfall, land cover, lithology, soil types, curvature, profile curvature, stream power index, and topographic wetness index). We carried out the validation process using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and several parametric and non-parametric performance metrics, including positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, root mean square error, and the Friedman and Wilcoxon sign rank tests. The AB model (AUC = 0.96) performed better than the ensemble AB-ADTree model (AUC = 0.94) and successfully outperformed the ADTree model (AUC = 0.59) in predicting landslide susceptibility. Our findings provide insights into the development of more efficient and accurate landslide predictive models that can be used by decision makers and land-use managers to mitigate landslide hazards.
机译:我们使用了Adaboost(AB),交替的决策树(Adtree),以及它们作为集合模型(AB-Adtree)的组合,以在马来西亚Cameron Highlands的空间预测山体滑坡。使用合成孔径雷达干涉测定法,谷歌地球图像和现场调查,以及17个条件因素(斜坡,方面,海拔,距离河流,距离河流,靠近故障的距离,道路密度,道路密度距离,路密距离,距离距离,距离河流,距离距离,道路密度距离,道路密度距离,道路密度距离,道路密度距离,道路密度距离,道路密度距离,道路密度距离,道路密度距离,道路密度距离,道路密度距离,路密度距离,路密度距离,路密度距离,路密度距离,路密度距离,路密度距离,路密度距离,距离河流),培训了152个滑坡的数据库培训。 ,河流密度,归一化差异植被指数,降雨,陆地,岩性,土壤类型,曲率,轮廓曲率,流功率指标和地形湿度指数)。我们使用接收器操作特征曲线(AUC)下的区域和几个参数和非参数性能度量的区域进行了验证过程,包括肯定预测值,否定预测值,灵敏度,特异性,准确性,根均方误差和弗里德曼和威尔科克朗签署等级测试。 AB模型(AUC = 0.96)比集合AB-Adtree模型(AUC = 0.94)更好地执行,并且成功地表现出Adtree模型(AUC = 0.59),以预测滑坡易感性。我们的调查结果提供了在制定更高效和准确的滑坡预测模型的洞察中,可以由决策者和土地利用管理者使用的更有效和准确的滑坡预测模型来缓解滑坡危险。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号