首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Feeding Interventions for Infants with Growth Failure in the First Six Months of Life: A Systematic Review
【2h】

Feeding Interventions for Infants with Growth Failure in the First Six Months of Life: A Systematic Review

机译:患有生长失败的婴儿在生命的前六个月内喂养干预:系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

(1) Introduction: Current evidence on managing infants under six months with growth failure or other nutrition-related risk is sparse and low quality. This review aims to inform research priorities to fill this evidence gap, focusing on breastfeeding practices. (2) Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Library for studies on feeding interventions that aim to restore or improve the volume or quality of breastmilk and breastfeeding when breastfeeding practices are sub-optimal or prematurely stopped. We included studies from both low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries. (3) Results: Forty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were from high-income countries ( = 35, 74.5%) and included infants who were at risk of growth failure at birth (preterm infants/small for gestational age) and newborns with early growth faltering. Interventions included formula fortification or supplementation ( = 31, 66%), enteral feeds ( = 8, 17%), cup feeding ( = 2, 4.2%), and other ( = 6, 12.8%). Outcomes included anthropometric change ( = 40, 85.1%), reported feeding practices ( = 16, 34%), morbidity ( = 11, 23.4%), and mortality ( = 5, 10.6%). Of 31 studies that assessed formula fortification or supplementation, 30 reported anthropometric changes ( = 17 no effect, = 9 positive, = 4 mixed), seven morbidity ( = 3 no effect, = 2 positive, = 2 negative), five feeding ( = 2 positive, = 2 no effect, = 1 negative), and four mortality ( = 3 no effect, = 1 negative). Of eight studies that assessed enteral feed interventions, seven reported anthropometric changes ( = 4 positive, = 3 no effect), five feeding practices ( = 2 positive, = 2 no effect, = 1 negative), four morbidity ( = 4 no effect), and one reported mortality ( = 1 no effect). Overall, interventions with positive effects on feeding practices were cup feeding compared to bottle-feeding among preterm; nasogastric tube feed compared to bottle-feeding among low birth weight preterm; and early progressive feeding compared to delayed feeding among extremely low birth weight preterm. Bovine/cow milk feeding and high volume feeding interventions had an unfavourable effect, while electric breast pump and Galactagogue had a mixed effect. Regarding anthropometric outcomes, overall, macronutrient fortified formula, cream supplementation, and fortified human milk formula had a positive effect (weight gain) on preterm infants. Interventions comparing human breastmilk/donor milk with formula had mixed effects. Overall, only human milk compared to formula intervention had a positive effect on morbidity among preterm infants, while none of the interventions had any positive effect on mortality. Bovine/cow milk supplementation had unfavourable effects on both morbidity and mortality. (4) Conclusion: Future research should prioritise low- and middle-income countries, include infants presenting with growth failure in the post-neonatal period and record effects on morbidity and mortality outcomes.
机译:(1)介绍:关于六个月内管理婴幼儿的现有证据,增长失败或其他相关风险稀疏和低质量。该审查旨在为研究优先事项提供信息,以填补此证据差距,重点是母乳喂养实践。 (2)方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Cinahl Plus和Cochrane图书馆,以研究饲养干预措施,旨在恢复或改善母乳喂养实践时母乳喂养和母乳喂养的体积或质量和母乳喂养的喂养和母乳喂养。我们包括低收入和中等收入国家和高收入国家的研究。 (3)结果:四十七项研究达到了纳入标准。大多数来自高收入国家(= 35,74.5%),包括出生生长衰竭的婴儿(早产儿/小于胎龄)和新生儿,早期生长摇摇欲坠。干预包括配方强化或补充剂(= 31,66%),肠内饲料(= 8,17%),杯饲料(= 2,4.2%)和其他(= 6,12.8%)。结果包括人类测量变化(= 40,85.1%),报告的饲养实践(= 16,34%),发病率(= 11,23.4%)和死亡率(= 5,10.6%)。 31项研究,评估配方强化或补充,30例报告的人类测量变化(= 17无效,= 9阳性,= 4混合),七种发病率(= 3无效,= 2阳性,= 2个阴性),五次饲料(= 2阳性,= 2无效果,= 1阴性),四个死亡率(= 3没有效果,= 1负)。在八项研究中评估肠内饲料干预措施,七个报告的人类测量变化(= 4阳性,= 3没有效果),五个饲料实践(= 2阳性,= 2无效,= 1阴性),四种发病率(= 4无效)和一个报告的死亡率(= 1没有效果)。总体而言,与早产之间的瓶子相比,饲养效果的干预措施是杯饲料;鼻胃管饲料与低出生体重的瓶子相比;与极低出生体重早产之间的延迟喂养相比,早期进行喂养。牛/牛奶喂养和大卷喂养干预措施具有不利的效果,而电动泵和冻剂具有混合效果。关于人类学结果,总体而言,Macronurient强化配方,乳膏补充剂和强化人乳配方在早产儿的积极作用(体重增加)。将人母乳/供体牛奶与配方进行比较的干预措施具有混合效应。总体而言,只有与配方干预相比的人乳对早产儿中的发病率相比,而且干预措施都没有对死亡率产生任何积极影响。牛/牛奶补充对发病率和死亡率产生不利影响。 (4)结论:未来的研究应优先考虑低收入和中等收入国家,包括在新生儿后期的生长失败,并记录发病率和死亡率结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号