首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Public Health Emergency Collection >Airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: Energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection
【2h】

Airborne disinfection using microwave-based technology: Energy efficient and distinct inactivation mechanism compared with waterborne disinfection

机译:使用微波技术的空气传播消毒:与水传播消毒相比具有节能和独特的灭活机制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Microwave has been extensively applied to inactivate microorganisms in liquids, food, and surfaces. However, energy efficiency is a limiting factor for the environmental application. The utilization pathway and energy efficiency of the microwave in different media have not been investigated. In this study, the inactivation performance, energy utilization, and bactericidal mechanisms for microwave-irradiated airborne and waterborne were compared. A Beer-Lambert law-based model was also developed and validated to compare the inactivation performance in different phases. Microwave had greater inactivation effect on airborne bacteria than waterborne bacteria. The inactivation rate constant for airborne (0.29 s ) was nearly 20 times higher than that of waterborne species (0.014 s ). Most of the absorbed microwave energy (92.3%) was converted to increase water temperature instead of inactivating the waterborne bacteria, because the microwave photons were easily absorbed by water molecules. By contrast, 45.4% of the absorbed energy could disinfect the airborne bacteria. Finally, the required energies for 1-log inactivation were calculated as 2.3 J and 116.9 J per log-inactivation for airborne and waterborne , respectively. The airborne and waterborne samples showed distinct microwave inactivation mechanisms. Waterborne disinfection was primarily due to thermal effect, while the non-thermal effect was the major mechanism for airborne inactivation.
机译:微波已广泛应用于灭活液体,食物和表面中的微生物。但是,能源效率是环境应用的限制因素。尚未研究微波在不同介质中的利用途径和能量效率。在这项研究中,比较了微波辐射的机载和水性的灭活性能,能量利用和杀菌机理。还开发并验证了基于Beer-Lambert法的模型,以比较不同阶段的灭活性能。微波对空气传播细菌的灭活作用比水传播细菌大。空气传播的灭活速率常数(0.29 s)比水传播的灭活速率常数(0.014 s)高近20倍。由于微波光子很容易被水分子吸收,因此大部分吸收的微波能量(92.3%)被转化为提高水温,而不是使水生细菌失活。相比之下,45.4%的吸收能量可以对空气传播的细菌进行消毒。最后,对于一次对数灭活,空气和水基对数灭活所需的能量分别为2.3 J和116.9J。机载和水载样品显示出独特的微波灭活机理。水性消毒主要是由于热效应,而非热效应是导致空气灭活的主要机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号