首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nature Public Health Emergency Collection >Liberty to Decide on Dual Use Biomedical Research: An Acknowledged Necessity
【2h】

Liberty to Decide on Dual Use Biomedical Research: An Acknowledged Necessity

机译:决定两用生物医学研究的自由:公认的必要性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Humanity entered the twenty-first century with revolutionary achievements in biomedical research. At the same time multiple “dual-use” results have been published. The battle against infectious diseases is meeting new challenges, with newly emerging and re-emerging infections. Both natural disaster epidemics, such as SARS, avian influenza, haemorrhagic fevers, XDR and MDR tuberculosis and many others, and the possibility of intentional mis-use, such as letters containing anthrax spores in USA, 2001, have raised awareness of the real threats. Many great men, including Goethe, Spinoza, J.B. Shaw, Fr. Engels, J.F. Kennedy and others, have recognized that liberty is also a responsibility. That is why the liberty to decide now represents an acknowledged necessity: biomedical research should be supported, conducted and published with appropriate measures to prevent potential “dual use”. Biomedical scientists should work according to the ethical principles of their Code of Conduct, an analogue of Hippocrates Oath of doctors; and they should inform government, society and their juniors about the problem. National science consulting boards of experts should be created to prepare guidelines and control the problem at state level. An international board should develop minimum standards to be applicable by each country. Bio-preparedness is considered another key-measure.
机译:人类进入二十一世纪,在生物医学研究方面取得了革命性的成就。同时,多个“双重使用”结果已经发布。与传染病的斗争正在迎接新的挑战,新出现的和正在重新出现的感染。自然灾害流行病(例如SARS,禽流感,出血热,XDR和MDR结核病等)以及故意滥用的可能性(例如在美国于2001年包含炭疽孢子的信件)都提高了人们对真正威胁的认识。许多伟人,包括歌德,斯宾诺莎,肖·J·B·弗雷德。恩格斯,肯尼迪(J.F. Kennedy)等人已经认识到自由也是一种责任。这就是为什么自由决定现在已成为公认的必要性的原因:应当以适当的措施支持,进行和发表生物医学研究,以防止潜在的“双重使用”。生物医学科学家应按照其行为守则的伦理原则开展工作,这是希波克拉底宣誓医生的类似行为;他们应该将此问题告知政府,社会及其下级。应该建立国家科学咨询专家委员会,以准备指导方针并在州一级控制问题。国际委员会应制定最低标准,以适用于每个国家。生物准备被认为是另一项关键措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号