首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nature Public Health Emergency Collection >Educating for Citizenship: Reappraising the Role of Science Education
【2h】

Educating for Citizenship: Reappraising the Role of Science Education

机译:公民教育:重新评估科学教育的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

New discoveries and technological inventions render the world increasingly complex. Fostering students’ scientific and technological literacy has, therefore, become a primary goal for many science educators. Yet the concept of scientific literacy is itself not at all clear. In this article, we contest the dominant approach, which defines scientific literacy in terms of what scientists produce or do. We argue that a more viable approach begins by framing a more general project of (democratic) citizenship and asks what kind of scientific literacy can contribute to this project. The different parts of our argument are illustrated with data from a three-year ethnographic study of science in one community. These data feature adult residents who were dealing with the contested issue of whether or not to extend the existing water main in order to supply with water a part of the community that, at the time, had to rely on seasonally contaminated wells. Irrespective of their science background, these citizens engaged scientists. We argue that educating for citizenship presupposes participation in democratic processes, a stance that has considerable implications for science education.
机译:新发现和技术发明使世界变得越来越复杂。因此,培养学生的科学技术素养已成为许多科学教育工作者的首要目标。然而,科学素养的概念本身还不清楚。在本文中,我们对占主导地位的方法提出质疑,该方法根据科学家的生产或行为定义了科学素养。我们认为,一种更可行的方法是从框架(民主)公民身份的更一般的项目开始,并询问什么样的科学素养可以为该项目做出贡献。我们对一个社区进行的为期三年的人种学研究得出的数据说明了我们论点的不同部分。这些数据的特点是成年居民正在处理是否要扩展现有的供水总管以便为当时必须依靠季节性污染的水井的社区提供水的问题。无论其科学背景如何,这些公民都会聘请科学家。我们认为,公民教育必须以参与民主进程为前提,这一立场对科学教育具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号