首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Public Health Emergency Collection >Diverging temporalities of care work on urban farms: Negotiating history responsibility and productivity in Lithuania
【2h】

Diverging temporalities of care work on urban farms: Negotiating history responsibility and productivity in Lithuania

机译:城市农场护理工作的时间差异:立陶宛的谈判历史责任和生产力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While scholars have developed a nuanced understanding of agriculture as a form of care, the temporal organization of farming practices has received little consideration. Focusing on how farmers organize and experience agriculture, we track diverging approaches to care work on urban farms in Vilnius, Lithuania. Our ethnographic fieldwork and interviews show how Lithuanian urban farmers are struggling to reconcile the civic ideals of the global urban farming movement with their historical understandings of care for specific plants and the land. Whereas the older generation views farming as kinship-based individualized work focusing on particular plants and garden ecologies, the younger generation approaches it as a way to unwind, mediate, and build a community. These different perspectives on farming translate into divergent temporalities of care in which productivist goals rooted in socialist self-provisioning practices and embodied in orderly landscapes encounter new trends of agricultural care manifested in the natural aesthetics of the farms. We examine dynamic tensions between the two farming modalities by linking them to different understandings of moral commitments and responsibilities for plants and land. Through the lens of temporality, we also show how these divergent care modes are themselves grounded in gender inequalities reproduced on the farms and enabled by by the welfare state institutions, including maternity leave and retirement policies.
机译:尽管学者们已经对农业作为一种照顾形式有了细微的了解,但农业实践的时间安排却很少受到考虑。着眼于农民如何组织和体验农业,我们追踪立陶宛维尔纽斯城市农场护理工作的不同方法。我们的人种志田野调查和访谈表明,立陶宛城市农民如何通过对特殊植物和土地的养护的历史理解,努力调和全球城市农业运动的公民理想。老一辈将农业视为基于亲属关系的个性化工作,着重于特定的植物和花园生态,而年轻一代则将其视为放松,调解和建立社区的一种方式。这些关于农业的不同观点转化为不同的照料时间,在这种照料中,植根于社会主义自我供给实践并体现在有序景观中的生产主义目标遇到了农场自然美学所体现的新的农业照料趋势。通过将两种耕作方式与对植物和土地的道德承诺和责任的不同理解联系起来,我们研究了它们之间的动态紧张关系。通过暂时性的视角,我们还展示了这些差异化的照护模式本身是如何基于农场上再现的性别不平等现象,并由福利国家机构(包括产假和退休政策)促成的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号