首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medicines >Chromatographic Chemometric and Antioxidant Assessment of the Equivalence of Granules and Herbal Materials of Angelicae Sinensis Radix
【2h】

Chromatographic Chemometric and Antioxidant Assessment of the Equivalence of Granules and Herbal Materials of Angelicae Sinensis Radix

机译:当归颗粒颗粒和中草药成分的色谱化学计量和抗氧化评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Granules are a popular way of administrating herbal decoctions. However, there are no standardised quality control methods for granules, with few studies comparing the granules to traditional herbal decoctions. This study developed a multi-analytical platform to compare the quality of granule products to herb/decoction pieces of Angelicae Sinensis Radix (Danggui). A validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with photodiode array detector (UPLC-PDA) method quantitatively compared the aqueous extracts. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA) clustered the samples according to three chemical compounds: ferulic acid, caffeic acid and Z-ligustilide. Ferric ion-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging capacity (DPPH) assessed the antioxidant activity of the samples. HCA and PCA allocated the samples into two main groups: granule products and herb/decoction pieces. Greater differentiation between the samples was obtained with three chemical markers compared to using one marker. The herb/decoction pieces group showed comparatively higher extraction yields and significantly higher DPPH and FRAP ( < 0.05), which was positively correlated to caffeic acid and ferulic acid, respectively. The results confirm the need for the quality assessment of granule products using more than one chemical marker for widespread practitioner and consumer use.
机译:颗粒剂是一种常用的中草药汤剂。但是,目前尚无用于颗粒的标准化质量控制方法,很少有将颗粒与传统草药汤进行比较的研究。本研究开发了一个多分析平台,比较当归/当归中草药/煎剂的颗粒产品质量。经过验证的超高效液相色谱仪与光电二极管阵列检测器(UPLC-PDA)方法相结合,定量比较了水性萃取液。层次聚集聚类分析(HCA)和主成分分析(PCA)根据三种化学成分对样品进行聚类:阿魏酸,咖啡酸和Z-ligustilide。降低铁离子的抗氧化能力(FRAP)和2,2-二苯基-1-甲基肼基自由基清除能力(DPPH)评估了样品的抗氧化活性。 HCA和PCA将样品分为两大类:颗粒产品和草药/煎剂。与使用一种标记相比,使用三种化学标记可获得更大的样品区分度。中药/煎剂组的提取率较高,DPPH和FRAP显着较高(<0.05),分别与咖啡酸和阿魏酸呈正相关。结果证实,有必要使用一种以上的化学标记物对颗粒产品进行质量评估,以供从业者和消费者广泛使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号