首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Maternal Child Nutrition >Short‐term efficacy of two breast pumps and impact on breastfeeding outcomes at 6 months in exclusively breastfeeding mothers: A randomised trial
【2h】

Short‐term efficacy of two breast pumps and impact on breastfeeding outcomes at 6 months in exclusively breastfeeding mothers: A randomised trial

机译:在纯母乳喂养的母亲中两个吸奶器的短期疗效以及对六个月母乳喂养结果的影响:一项随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The provision of breast pumps is a potential strategy to increase breastfeeding duration. This trial compared the effectiveness and acceptability of two breast pumps in mothers exclusively breastfeeding (EBF) their healthy term infant. It also tested whether provision of pumps versus vouchers of equivalent value influenced breastfeeding or attainment of mothers' goals at 3 and 6 months. Mothers were randomised at 3‐ to 4‐week post‐partum (Beijing [  = 30], Moscow [  = 34], London [  = 45], New York [  = 3]) to groups A (Philips single‐electric pump, Natural bottle), B (Medela Swing single‐electric pump, Calma bottle), or C (Control; vouchers). At 6 weeks, group A and B mothers expressed for 10 min/breast; milk weight and opinions of pump/bottle were recorded. Feeding practices were assessed using questionnaires at 3 and 6 months. Milk weight/flow pattern did not differ between groups. Pump A scored significantly better for ease‐of‐use, cushion‐feel, need‐to‐lean‐forward, pleasant, comfort. At 3 and 6 months, %EBF or meeting their goal was not significantly different; (3 months: 86%, 85%, 84%; 6 months: 20%, 15%, 26%; meeting goal 24%, 17%, 27% for A, B, and C). Expressed breast milk (EBM) provision was higher in groups A and B (3 months: 76%, 76%, 24% (  p
机译:提供吸奶器是增加母乳喂养时间的潜在策略。该试验比较了两个吸乳器在其健康足月婴儿中的纯母乳喂养(EBF)母亲的有效性和可接受性。它还测试了提供同等价值的泵与代用券是否会影响3个月和6个月的母乳喂养或母亲目标的实现。母亲在产后3-4周(北京[= 30],莫斯科[= 34],伦敦[= 45],纽约[= 3])随机分为A组(菲利普斯单电泵,自然瓶),B(Medela Swing单电泵,Calma瓶)或C(控制;优惠券)。在6周时,A组和B组母亲每次母乳表达10分钟;记录牛奶重量和泵/瓶子的意见。在3个月和6个月时使用问卷调查喂养方式。两组之间的牛奶重量/流量模式没有差异。 Pump A在易用性,缓冲感,前倾性,舒适性和舒适性方面得分更高。在3个月和6个月时,%EBF或达到目标的情况无显着差异; (3个月:86%,85%,84%; 6个月:20%,15%,26%; A,B和C达到目标24%,17%,27%)。 A组和B组的母乳(EBM)供给较高(3个月:76%,76%,24%(p

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号