首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis >Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis with automated immunoassays
【2h】

Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis with automated immunoassays

机译:通过自动免疫测定对梅毒进行实验室诊断

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The serological detection of specific antibodies to is of particular importance in the diagnosis of syphilis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performances of automated immunoassays in comparison with hemagglutination test (TPHA) and Western Blot (WB). The retrospective study was performed with different panels of sera: 244 clinical and serological characterized syphilitic sera and 203 potentially interfering samples. All the sera were tested by Enzygnost Syphilis, ARCHITECT Syphilis TP, TPHA, and homemade WB. The diagnostic performances of the two assays were very similar: both Enzygnost Syphilis and ARCHITECT Syphilis TP performed with a sensitivity of 99.2%, whereas the specificity was 98.5 and 98.4%, respectively. Considering the suitability for automation, both immunoassays may represent a good choice as a screening test. However, the use of a confirmatory test, such as TPHA or WB, remains a must in order to avoid false‐positive results. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 23:1–6, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
机译:特异性抗体的血清学检测在梅毒的诊断中特别重要。这项研究的目的是评估与血凝试验(TPHA)和Western Blot(WB)相比自动免疫测定的诊断性能。回顾性研究使用了不同的血清:244例临床和血清学特征性梅毒血清和203例潜在干扰样品。所有血清均由Enzygnost Syphilis,ARCHITECT Syphilis TP,TPHA和自制WB测试。两种测定的诊断性能非常相似:Enzygnost Syphilis和ARCHITECT Syphilis TP的灵敏度均为99.2%,而特异性分别为98.5和98.4%。考虑到自动化的适用性,两种免疫测定法都可以作为筛选测试的好选择。但是,仍然必须使用诸如TPHA或WB之类的确认性测试,以避免假阳性结果。 J.临床实验室肛门2009年23:1–6。©2009 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号