首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis >Reference distributions for immunoglobulins A G and M: A comparison of a large cohort to the worlds literature
【2h】

Reference distributions for immunoglobulins A G and M: A comparison of a large cohort to the worlds literature

机译:免疫球蛋白AG和M的参考分布:大型队列与世界文献的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinical interpretation of immunoglobulin measurements requires accurate and precise assays and widely accepted reference preparations, as well as reliable age‐ and gender‐specific reference ranges. This last requirement, the topic of numerous publications, has not been addressed adequately. By a combination of computerized and hand searching of the literature from 1961 to 1997, we identified 109 publications presenting IgA, IgG, and/or IgM reference data in healthy individuals. After eliminating studies that lacked appropriate clinical, statistical, or reference material information, data from the 17 acceptable studies were converted to a common reference material, CRM 470/RPPHS. When median levels from our recently published large cohort study are superimposed on these published medians, they fall within the ranges of reported medians. The widths of published 95 percentile reference ranges (where each individual's health was verified) were also found to agree closely with the reference range widths found in our data (where inclusion was based on the reported diagnosis). The current combined study of narrowly applied reference ranges validates our recently published age‐ and gender‐specific reference data for immunoglobulins A, G, and M. Those new data can now be considered as a source of reliable reference ranges to be used by laboratories when interpreting immunoglobulin measurements. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 12:371–377, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
机译:免疫球蛋白测量的临床解释需要准确,精确的测定方法和广泛接受的参考制剂,以及可靠的年龄和性别特异性参考范围。最后的要求,许多出版物的主题,没有得到足够的解决。通过对1961年至1997年文献的计算机化和手工检索相结合,我们确定了109篇发表健康个体中IgA,IgG和/或IgM参考数据的出版物。在消除缺乏适当的临床,统计或参考材料信息的研究后,将来自17个可接受研究的数据转换为通用参考材料CRM 470 / RPPHS。当我们最近发表的大型队列研究的中位数水平叠加在这些已发布的中位数上时,它们将落在报告的中位数范围内。还发现已发布的95%参考范围(已验证每个人的健康状况)的宽度与我们数据中的参考范围宽度(其中基于报告的诊断结果得出的宽度)非常吻合。目前对狭义应用参考范围的联合研究验证了我们最近发布的针对免疫球蛋白A,G和M的年龄和性别特异性参考数据。这些新数据现在可被视为实验室可使用的可靠参考范围的来源解释免疫球蛋白的测量结果。 J.临床实验室肛门1998年12:371–377。©1998 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号