首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Human Brain Mapping >Investigating category‐ and shape‐selective neural processing in ventral and dorsal visual stream under interocular suppression
【2h】

Investigating category‐ and shape‐selective neural processing in ventral and dorsal visual stream under interocular suppression

机译:研究眼内抑制作用下腹侧和背侧视觉流中的类别和形状选择神经处理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies using continuous flash suppression (CFS) have suggested that action‐related processing in the dorsal visual stream might be independent of perceptual awareness, in line with the “vision‐for‐perception” versus “vision‐for‐action” distinction of the influential dual‐stream theory. It remains controversial if evidence suggesting exclusive dorsal stream processing of tool stimuli under CFS can be explained by their elongated shape alone or by action‐relevant category representations in dorsal visual cortex. To approach this question, we investigated category‐ and shape‐selective functional magnetic resonance imaging‐blood‐oxygen level‐dependent responses in both visual streams using images of faces and tools. Multivariate pattern analysis showed enhanced decoding of elongated relative to non‐elongated tools, both in the ventral and dorsal visual stream. The second aim of our study was to investigate whether the depth of interocular suppression might differentially affect processing in dorsal and ventral areas. However, parametric modulation of suppression depth by varying the CFS mask contrast did not yield any evidence for differential modulation of category‐selective activity. Together, our data provide evidence for shape‐selective processing under CFS in both dorsal and ventral stream areas and, therefore, do not support the notion that dorsal “vision‐for‐action” processing is exclusively preserved under interocular suppression. . © .
机译:最近使用连续闪光抑制(CFS)进行的行为和神经影像学研究表明,背视流中与动作相关的处理可能独立于感知意识,这与“感知视觉”与“感知动作”相符有影响力的双流理论的区别。是否有证据表明在CFS下仅对工具刺激进行背流处理的证据可以通过其单独的拉长形状或在背侧视觉皮层中的与动作相关的类别表示来解释。为了解决这个问题,我们使用脸部和工具图像研究了视觉流中类别和形状选择功能磁共振成像,血氧水平的依赖响应。多元模式分析显示,相对于非拉长工具,无论是在腹侧还是在背侧视觉流中,对拉长工具的解码效果均得到增强。我们研究的第二个目的是研究眼内压迫深度是否会不同地影响背侧和腹侧区域的加工。但是,通过改变CFS掩模对比度来对抑制深度进行参数调制,并不能提供对类别选择性活动进行差分调制的任何证据。在一起,我们的数据提供了在CFS下在背侧和腹侧流区域进行形状选择处理的证据,因此,不支持背视“作用力”处理仅在眼内压制下保留的观点。 。 ©。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号