首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Human Brain Mapping >Face recognition under ambiguous visual stimulation: fMRI correlates of encoding styles
【2h】

Face recognition under ambiguous visual stimulation: fMRI correlates of encoding styles

机译:模糊视觉刺激下的面部识别:fMRI与编码样式相关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Object categorization during ambiguous sensory stimulation generally depends on the activity of extrastriate sensory areas as well as top‐down information. Both reflect internal representations of prototypical object knowledge against which incoming sensory information is compared. However, besides these general mechanisms, individuals might differ in their readiness to impose internal representations onto incoming ambiguous information. These individual differences might be based on what was referred to as “Schema Instantiation Threshold” (SIT; Lewicki et al. [ ]: Am Pshycol 47:796–801), defining a continuum from very rapid (low threshold) to a rather controlled application of internal representations (high threshold). We collected fMRI scans while subjects with low SIT (“internal encoders”) and subjects with high SIT (“external encoders”) made gender categorizations of ambiguous facial images. Internal encoders made faster gender decisions during high sensory ambiguity, showed higher fusiform activity, and had faster BOLD responses in the fusiform (FFA) and occipital face area (OFA) indicating a faster and stronger application of face‐gender representations due to a low SIT threshold. External encoders made slower gender decisions and showed increased medial frontal activity, indicating a more controlled strategy during gender categorizations and increased decisional uncertainties. Internal encoders showed higher functional connectivity of the orbito‐frontal cortex (OFC) to seed activity in the FFA which might indicate both more readily generated predictive classificatory guesses and the subjective impressions of accurate classifications. Taken together, an “internal encoding style” is characterized by the fast, unsupervised and unverified application of primary object representations, whereas the opposite seems evident for subjects with an “external encoding style”. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
机译:模棱两可的感觉刺激过程中的对象分类通常取决于外部感觉区域的活动以及自上而下的信息。两者都反映了原型对象知识的内部表示,并与传入的传感信息进行了比较。但是,除了这些一般机制之外,个人在将内部表示形式强加于传入的歧义信息上的准备程度可能有所不同。这些个体差异可能基于所谓的“架构实例化阈值”(SIT; Lewicki等人:[Am Pshycol 47:796-801]),定义了从非常快(低阈值)到相当可控的连续性内部表述的应用(高阈值)。我们收集了功能磁共振成像扫描,而SIT低的受试者(“内部编码器”)和SIT高的受试者(“外部编码器”)对歧义的面部图像进行了性别分类。内部编码器在高感官歧义时做出更快的性别决定,表现出更高的梭形活动,并且在梭形(FFA)和枕面部区域(OFA)中的BOLD响应更快,这表明由于SIT较低,脸部性别代表的应用更加迅速和强大阈。外部编码器做出的性别决策较慢,并且内侧额叶活动增加,这表明在性别分类过程中控制策略更加严格,决策不确定性也有所增加。内部编码器显示了眶额皮质(OFC)与FFA中种子活动的较高功能连通性,这可能表明更容易产生预测性分类猜测和准确分类的主观印象。总体而言,“内部编码风格”的特征在于主要对象表示的快速,无监督和未经验证的应用,而对于具有“外部编码风格”的主题,相反的情况似乎显而易见。嗡嗡的脑图,2010年。©2010 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号