首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease >External Quality Assessment of Bacterial Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in African National Public Health Laboratories 2011–2016
【2h】

External Quality Assessment of Bacterial Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in African National Public Health Laboratories 2011–2016

机译:非洲国家公共卫生实验室2011-2016年细菌鉴定和抗菌药物敏感性测试的外部质量评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: In 2002, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a regional microbiology external quality assessment (EQA) programme for national public health laboratories in the African region, initially targeting priority epidemic-prone bacterial diseases, and later including other common bacterial pathogens. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse the efficacy of an EQA programme as a laboratory quality system evaluation tool. Methods: We analysed the proficiency of laboratories’ performance of bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for the period 2011–2016. The National Institute for Communicable Diseases of South Africa provided technical coordination following an agreement with WHO, and supplied EQA samples of selected bacterial organisms for microscopy (Gram stain), identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). National public health laboratories, as well as laboratories involved in the Invasive Bacterial Diseases Surveillance Network, were enrolled by the WHO Regional Office for Africa to participate in the EQA programme. We analysed participants’ results of 41 surveys, which included the following organisms sent as challenges: Typhi, Enteritidis, , and . Results: Eighty-one laboratories from 45 countries participated. Overall, 76% of participants obtained acceptable scores for identification, but a substantial proportion of AST scores were not in the acceptable range. Of 663 assessed AST responses, only 42% had acceptable scores. Conclusion: In the African Region, implementation of diagnostic stewardship in clinical bacteriology is generally suboptimal. This report illustrates that AST is poorly done compared to microscopy and identification. It is critically important to make the case for implementation of quality assurance in AST, as it is the cornerstone of antimicrobial resistance surveillance reporting and implementation of the Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System.
机译:背景:2002年,世界卫生组织(WHO)为非洲地区的国家公共卫生实验室启动了区域微生物外部质量评估(EQA)计划,该计划最初针对易发流行病的细菌性疾病,后来针对其他常见细菌病原体。目的:本研究的目的是分析作为实验室质量体系评估工具的EQA计划的有效性。方法:我们分析了实验室在2011–2016年期间进行细菌鉴定和抗菌药敏测试(AST)的能力。南非国家传染病研究所与世界卫生组织达成协议后提供了技术协调,并提供了所选细菌生物体的EQA样品用于显微镜检查(革兰氏染色),鉴定和抗菌药敏试验(AST)。世卫组织非洲区域办事处招募了国家公共卫生实验室以及侵入性细菌性疾病监测网络所涉实验室,以参加EQA计划。我们对参与者的41项调查结果进行了分析,其中包括以下挑战性微生物:伤寒菌,肠炎沙门氏菌和。结果:来自45个国家的81个实验室参加了会议。总体而言,有76%的参与者获得了可接受的鉴定分数,但很大一部分的AST分数不在可接受的范围内。在663个评估的AST反应中,只有42%的分数可接受。结论:在非洲地区,在临床细菌学中实施诊断性管理通常是次优的。该报告说明,与显微镜检查和鉴定相比,AST做得不好。在AST中实施质量保证至关重要,因为它是抗菌素耐药性监测报告和实施全球抗菌素耐药性监测系统的基石。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号