首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Preventive Medicine Reports >Evaluation of family health history collection methods impact on data and risk assessment outcomes
【2h】

Evaluation of family health history collection methods impact on data and risk assessment outcomes

机译:评估家庭健康史收集方法对数据和风险评估结果的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Information technology applications for patient-collection of family health history (FHH) increase identification of elevated-risk individuals compared to usual care. It is unknown if the method of collection impacts data collected or if simply going directly to the patient is what makes the difference. The objective of this study was to examine differences in data detail and risk identification rates between FHH collection directly from individuals using paper-based forms and an interactive web-based platform. This is a non-randomized epidemiologic study in Singaporean population from 2016 to 2018. Intervention was paper-based versus web-based interactive platform for FHH collection. Participant demographics, FHH detail, and risk assessment results were analyzed. 882 participants enrolled in the study, 481 in the paper-based group and 401 in the web-based group with mean (SD) age of 45.4 (12.98) years and 47.5% male. Web-based FHH collection participants had an increased number of conditions per relative (p-value <0.001), greater frequency of reporting age of onset (p-value <0.001), and greater odds of receiving ≥1 risk recommendation both overall (OR: 3.99 (2.41, 6.59)) and within subcategories of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer syndromes (p-value = 0.041) and screening and prevention for breast (p-value = 0.002) and colon cancer (p-value = 0.005). This has significant implications for clinical care and research efforts where FHH is being assessed. Using interactive information technology platforms to collect FHH can improve the completeness of the data collected and result in increased rates of risk identification. Methods of data collection to maximize benefit should be taken into account in future studies and clinical care.
机译:与常规护理相比,信息技术在患者收集家庭健康史(FHH)中的应用增加了对高危人群的识别。收集方法是否会影响所收集的数据,或者直接导致患者差异的原因尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是使用纸质表格和基于Web的交互式平台,直接检查来自个人的FHH收集之间的数据细节和风险识别率之间的差异。这是2016年至2018年在新加坡人口中进行的非随机流行病学研究。干预是基于纸质与基于网络的FHH收集互动平台。分析了参加者的人口统计学,FHH详细信息和风险评估结果。该研究共纳入882名参与者,纸质组481名,网络组401名,平均(SD)年龄为45.4(12.98)岁,男性为47.5%。基于网络的FHH收集参与者的每个亲戚的病状数量增加(p值<0.001),报告发病年龄的频率更高(p值<0.001),并且总体上接受≥1个风险推荐的可能性更高(OR :3.99(2.41,6.59))以及遗传咨询综合征的遗传咨询子类别(p值= 0.041)以及乳腺癌的筛查和预防(p值= 0.002)和结肠癌的筛查和预防(p值= 0.005)。这对正在评估FHH的临床护理和研究工作具有重要意义。使用交互式信息技术平台收集FHH可以提高所收集数据的完整性,并提高风险识别率。在未来的研究和临床护理中应考虑最大程度受益的数据收集方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号