首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Six Automated Treponema-Specific Antibody Assays
【2h】

Comparison of Six Automated Treponema-Specific Antibody Assays

机译:六种自动化梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体检测方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Six different Treponema (TP)-specific immunoassays were compared to the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) test. A total of 615 samples were tested. The overall percent agreement, analytical sensitivity, and analytical specificity of each assay compared to the FTA-ABS test were as follows: Architect Syphilis TP, 99.2%, 96.8%, and 100%; Cobas Syphilis, 99.8%, 99.4%, and 100%; ADVIA Centaur Syphilis, 99.8%, 99.4%, and 100%; HISCL Anti-TP assay kit, 99.7%, 98.7%, and 100%; Immunoticles Auto3 TP, 99.0%, 97.5%, and 99.6%; Mediace TPLA, 98.0%, 98.1%, and 98.0%. All results that were discrepant between the TP-specific assays were associated with samples from noninfectious cases (11 immunoassay false positives and 7 from previous syphilis cases). Our study demonstrated that TP-specific immunoassays generally showed high sensitivities, specificities, and percentages of agreement compared to FTA-ABS, with rare cases of false-positive or false-negative results. Therefore, most TP-specific immunoassays are acceptable for use in screening for syphilis. However, it is important to perform a thorough review of a patient's clinical and treatment history for interpreting the results of syphilis serology.
机译:将六种不同的梅毒螺旋体(TP)特异性免疫分析方法与荧光性视网膜螺旋体抗体吸收(FTA-ABS)测试进行了比较。总共测试了615个样品。与FTA-ABS测试相比,每种测定的总体一致性,分析敏感性和分析特异性如下:建筑师Syphilis TP,分别为99.2%,96.8%和100%; Cobas Syphilis,分别为99.8%,99.4%和100%; ADVIA Centaur Syphilis,分别为99.8%,99.4%和100%; HISCL Anti-TP分析试剂盒,分别为99.7%,98.7%和100%; Immunoticles Auto3 TP分别为99.0%,97.5%和99.6%; TPLA中位数分别为98.0%,98.1%和98.0%。 TP特异性检测之间所有差异的结果均与非感染病例的样本相关(11例免疫测定假阳性和7例先前梅毒病例)。我们的研究表明,与FTA-ABS相比,TP特异性免疫测定法通常显示出较高的敏感性,特异性和一致性,并且很少有假阳性或假阴性结果。因此,大多数TP特异性免疫测定可用于梅毒筛查。但是,对患者的临床和治疗史进行全面检查对于解释梅毒血清学结果很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号