首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>MDM Policy Practice >Medical Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Shared Decision Making: Results From a Multinational Cross-Sectional Survey
【2h】

Medical Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Shared Decision Making: Results From a Multinational Cross-Sectional Survey

机译:医学生对共享决策的知识和态度:跨国跨部门调查的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We aimed to conduct a multinational cross-sectional online survey of medical students’ attitudes toward, knowledge of, and experience with shared decision making (SDM). We conducted the survey from September 2016 until May 2017 using the following: 1) a convenience sample of students from four medical schools each in Canada, the United States, and the Netherlands ( = 12), and 2) all medical schools in the United Kingdom through the British Medical School Council ( = 32). We also distributed the survey through social media. A total of 765 students read the information sheet and 619 completed the survey. Average age was 24, 69% were female. Mean SDM knowledge score was 83.6% (range = 18.8% to 100%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 82.8% to 84.5%). US students had the highest knowledge scores (86.2%, 95% CI = 84.8% to 87.6%). The mean risk communication score was 57.4% (range = 0% to 100%; 95% CI = 57.4% to 60.1%). Knowledge did not vary with age, race, gender, school, or school year. Attitudes were positive, except 46% believed SDM could only be done with higher educated patients, and 80.9% disagreed that physician payment should be linked to SDM performance (increased with years in training, < 0.05). Attitudes did not vary due to any tested variable. Students indicated they were more likely than experienced clinicians to practice SDM (72.1% v. 48.8%). A total of 74.7% reported prior SDM training and 82.8% were interested in learning more about SDM. SDM knowledge is high among medical students in all four countries. Risk communication is less well understood. Attitudes indicate that further research is needed to understand how medical schools deliver and integrate SDM training into existing curricula.
机译:我们的目标是对医学生对共享决策(SDM)的态度,知识和经验进行在线跨国调查。我们从2016年9月至2017年5月进行了以下调查:1)对来自加拿大,美国和荷兰(= 12)的四所医学院的学生的便利样本,以及2)美国所有医学院的学生王国通过英国医学院理事会(= 32)获得。我们还通过社交媒体分发了调查。共有765名学生阅读了该信息表,共有619名学生完成了调查。平均年龄为24岁,女性为69%。 SDM知识平均得分为83.6%(范围= 18.8%至100%; 95%置信区间[CI] = 82.8%至84.5%)。美国学生的知识得分最高(86.2%,95%CI = 84.8%至87.6%)。平均风险沟通得分为57.4%(范围= 0%至100%; 95%CI = 57.4%至60.1%)。知识不会随年龄,种族,性别,学历或学年而变化。态度是积极的,除了46%的人认为SDM仅适用于受过高等教育的患者,而80.9%的人不同意医师的报酬应与SDM的表现挂钩(随着培训时间的增加,<0.05)。态度没有因任何测试变量而变化。学生指出,他们比有经验的临床医生更有可能进行SDM(72.1%对48.8%)。共有74.7%的人报告了先前的SDM培训,而82.8%的人对学习SDM感兴趣。在所有四个国家的医学生中,SDM知识很高。对风险沟通的了解较少。态度表明,需要进一步研究以了解医学院校如何提供SDM培训并将其整合到现有课程中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号