首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society >The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review Modern Application Complications and Future Direction
【2h】

The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review Modern Application Complications and Future Direction

机译:脑动脉瘤分流支架的演变历史回顾现代应用复杂性和未来方向

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In spite of the developing endovascular era, large (15–25 mm) and giant (>25 mm) wide-neck cerebral aneurysms remained technically challenging. Intracranial flow-diverting stents (FDS) were developed to address these challenges by targeting aneurysm hemodynamics to promote aneurysm occlusion. In 2011, the first FDS approved for use in the United States market. Shortly thereafter, the Pipeline of Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) study was published demonstrating high efficacy and a similar complication profile to other intracranial stents. The initial FDA instructions for use (IFU) limited its use to patients 22 years old or older with wide-necked large or giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery (ICA) from the petrous segment to superior hypophyseal artery/ophthalmic segment. Expanded IFU was tested in the Prospective Study on Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms with PipelineTM Embolization Device (PREMIER) trial. With further post-approval clinical data, the United States FDA expanded the IFU to include patients with small or medium, wide-necked saccular or fusiform aneurysms from the petrous ICA to the ICA terminus. However, IFU is more restrictive in South Korea than in United States. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have sought to evaluate the overall efficacy of FDS for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms and consistently identify FDS as an effective technique for the treatment of aneurysms broadly with complication rates similar to other traditional techniques. A growing body of literature has demonstrated high efficacy of FDS for small aneurysms; distal artery aneurysms; non-saccular aneurysms posterior circulation aneurysms and complication rates similar to traditional techniques. In the short interval since the Pipeline Embolization Device was first introduced, FDS has been firmly entrenched as a powerful tool in the endovascular armamentarium. As new FDS are developed, established FDS are refined, and delivery systems are improved the uses for FDS will only expand further. Researchers continue to work to optimize the mechanical characteristics of the FDS themselves, aiming to optimize deploy ability and efficacy. With expanded use for small to medium aneurysms and posterior circulation aneurysms, FDS technology is firmly entrenched as a powerful tool to treat challenging aneurysms, both primarily and as an adjunct to coil embolization. With the aforementioned advances, the ease of FDS deployment will improve and complication rates will be further minimized. This will only further establish FDS deployment as a key strategy in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.
机译:尽管血管内时代正在发展,但大颈动脉瘤(15–25 mm)和巨大颈动脉瘤(> 25 mm)仍然存在技术挑战。颅内分流支架(FDS)的开发旨在通过靶向动脉瘤的血流动力学来促进动脉瘤闭塞来应对这些挑战。 2011年,首个FDS获准在美国市场使用。此后不久,发表了《不可缠绕或失败的动脉瘤管道》(PUFS)研究,证明了其高疗效和与其他颅内支架相似的并发症。 FDA最初的使用说明(IFU)仅将其使用范围限于22岁或22岁以上的颈内动脉(ICA)颈宽大或巨大动脉瘤(从小节到上垂体/眼科节)的患者。使用PipelineTM栓塞装置(PREMIER)在颅内动脉瘤栓塞的前瞻性研究中测试了扩展的IFU。有了进一步的批准后临床数据,美国FDA扩大了IFU的范围,使其涵盖了从小ICA到ICA终末的中小,宽颈囊状或梭状动脉瘤的患者。但是,IFU在韩国比在美国更具限制性。几项系统的综述和荟萃分析已寻求评估FDS在治疗脑动脉瘤方面的总体疗效,并一贯认为FDS是治疗动脉瘤的有效技术,其并发症发生率与其他传统技术相似。越来越多的文献表明,FDS对小动脉瘤具有很高的疗效。远端动脉瘤;非囊性动脉瘤后循环动脉瘤的并发症发生率与传统技术相似。自从首次引入管道栓塞设备以来,在很短的时间内,FDS已牢固地确立为血管内武器库中的强大工具。随着新的FDS的开发,已建立的FDS的完善以及交付系统的改进,FDS的用途只会进一步扩大。研究人员继续致力于优化FDS自身的机械特性,旨在优化部署能力和功效。随着中小动脉瘤和后循环动脉瘤的广泛使用,FDS技术已牢固地确立了其为治疗具有挑战性的动脉瘤的强大工具,无论是主要还是线圈栓塞的辅助手段。随着上述进步,FDS部署的简易性将得到提高,并发症发生率将进一步降至最低。这只会进一步将FDS部署确定为治疗脑动脉瘤的关键策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号