首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Direct Colony Method versus Extraction Method for Identification of Gram-Positive Cocci by Use of Bruker Biotyper Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry
【2h】

Comparison of Direct Colony Method versus Extraction Method for Identification of Gram-Positive Cocci by Use of Bruker Biotyper Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry

机译:直接菌落法与提取法通过使用布鲁克生物分类仪基质辅助激光解吸电离-飞行时间质谱法鉴定革兰氏阳性球菌的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We evaluated Bruker Biotyper (version 2.0) matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) for the identification of 305 clinical isolates of staphylococci, streptococci, and related genera by comparing direct colony testing with preparatory extraction. Isolates were previously identified by use of phenotypic testing and/or 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Manufacturer-specified score cutoffs for genus- and species-level identification were used. After excluding 7 isolates not present in the Biotyper library, the Biotyper correctly identified 284 (95%) and 207 (69%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively, using extraction. By using direct colony testing, the Biotyper identified 168 (56%) and 60 (20%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively. Overall, more isolates were identified to the genus and species levels with preparatory extraction than with direct colony testing (P < 0.0001). The analysis was repeated after dividing the isolates into two subgroups, staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci (n = 217) and “related genera” (n = 81). For the former subgroup, the extraction method resulted in the identification of 213 (98%) and 171 (79%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively, whereas the direct colony method identified 136 (63%) and 56 (26%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively. In contrast, for the subgroup of related genera, the extraction method identified 71 (88%) and 36 (44%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively, while the direct colony method identified 32 (40%) and 4 (5%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively. For both subgroups, preparatory extraction was superior to direct colony testing for the identification of isolates to the genus and species levels (P < 0.0001). Preparatory extraction is needed for the identification of a substantial proportion of Gram-positive cocci using the Biotyper method according to manufacturer-specified score cutoffs.
机译:我们通过比较直接菌落试验和预备菌落,评估了布鲁克生物鉴定仪(2.0版)基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)质谱(MS)来鉴定305株葡萄球菌,链球菌和相关属的临床分离株。萃取。以前使用表型测试和/或16S rRNA基因测序鉴定了分离株。使用制造商指定的分数截止值进行属和种级别的鉴定。在排除Biotyper文库中不存在的7种分离株后,Biotyper使用提取分别正确鉴定了284(95%)和207(69%)种属和物种水平的分离株。通过直接菌落测试,Biotyper分别确定了168株(56%)和60株(20%)到属和物种水平的分离株。总体而言,与直接菌落试验相比,通过预备提取鉴定出的属和种水平更高的分离株(P <0.0001)。将分离物分为葡萄球菌,链球菌和肠球菌(n = 217)和“相关属”(n = 81)两个亚组后,重复分析。对于前一个亚组,提取方法分别鉴定出213个(98%)和171个(79%)分离株的属和种水平,而直接菌落方法确定了136个(63%)和56个(26%) )分别分离到属和种的水平。相比之下,对于相关属的亚组,提取方法分别鉴定到属和种水平的分离株为71(88%)和36(44%),而直接菌落方法鉴定为32(40%)和4(5 %)分别分离到属和种水平。对于这两个亚组,预备提取均优于直接菌落测试,以鉴定出属和物种水平的分离株(P <0.0001)。根据生产商指定的评分标准,需要使用Biotyper方法进行准备性提取,以鉴定出大部分革兰氏阳性球菌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号