首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Preventive Medicine Reports >Support or competition? How online social networks increase physical activity: A randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Support or competition? How online social networks increase physical activity: A randomized controlled trial

机译:支持还是竞争?在线社交网络如何增加身体活动:一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To identify what features of online social networks can increase physical activity, we conducted a 4-arm randomized controlled trial in 2014 in Philadelphia, PA. Students (n = 790, mean age = 25.2) at an university were randomly assigned to one of four conditions composed of either supportive or competitive relationships and either with individual or team incentives for attending exercise classes. The social comparison condition placed participants into 6-person competitive networks with individual incentives. The social support condition placed participants into 6-person teams with team incentives. The combined condition with both supportive and competitive relationships placed participants into 6-person teams, where participants could compare their team's performance to 5 other teams' performances. The control condition only allowed participants to attend classes with individual incentives. Rewards were based on the total number of classes attended by an individual, or the average number of classes attended by the members of a team. The outcome was the number of classes that participants attended. Data were analyzed using multilevel models in 2014. The mean attendance numbers per week were 35.7, 38.5, 20.3, and 16.8 in the social comparison, the combined, the control, and the social support conditions. Attendance numbers were 90% higher in the social comparison and the combined conditions (mean = 1.9, SE = 0.2) in contrast to the two conditions without comparison (mean = 1.0, SE = 0.2) (p = 0.003). Social comparison was more effective for increasing physical activity than social support and its effects did not depend on individual or team incentives.
机译:为了确定在线社交网络的哪些功能可以增加体育锻炼,我们于2014年在宾夕法尼亚州费城进行了一项4组随机对照试验。将一所大学的学生(n = 790,平均年龄= 25.2)随机分配到以下四个条件之一中:支持性或竞争性关系,并具有个人或团队合作参加运动课的动机。社会比较条件将参与者置于具有个人激励的6人竞争网络中。社会支持条件将参与者分配到具有团队奖励的6人团队中。结合了支持性和竞争性关系的条件,参与者可以分为6人团队,参与者可以将其团队的表现与其他5个团队的表现进行比较。控制条件仅允许参与者凭个人动机参加课程。奖励基于个人参加的课程总数或团队成员参加的平均课程数量。结果就是参与者参加的课程数量。 2014年使用多层模型分析了数据。在社会比较,综合,控制和社会支持条件下,每周平均出勤人数为35.7、38.5、20.3和16.8。与没有比较的两个条件(平均值= 1.0,SE = 0.2)相比,社会比较和综合条件(平均值= 1.9,SE = 0.2)的出勤人数高90%(p = 0.003)。社会比较比增加社会支持更有效地增加体育锻炼,其效果不取决于个人或团队的激励。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号