首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Translational Science >3563 Clinical research training methods that improve self-efficacy in clinical research domains
【2h】

3563 Clinical research training methods that improve self-efficacy in clinical research domains

机译:3563在临床研究领域提高自我效能的临床研究培训方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The study aims to determine the current clinical research training interventions of MD-PhD programs and how effective they are in promoting clinical research self-efficacy. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A national survey of MD-PhD trainees was conducted in 2018 to identify clinical research training methods and self-efficacy for clinical research skills. MD-PhD program directors and coordinators from 108 institutions were asked to distribute the survey to their students. Responses were received from 61 institutions (56.5%). Responses were obtained from 647 MD-PhD students in all years of training, representing 17.9% of the 3613 possible participants at the 61 medical schools represented. No compensation was provided for this study. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The primary methods of clinical research training reported by students included didactics, mentored clinical research, didactics plus mentored clinical research, didactics plus clinical research practicum, and didactics plus mentored clinical research plus clinical research practicum. A quarter of all participants reported having no clinical research training. Clinical research self-efficacy was then correlated with the amount of clinical research training. Students exposed to no clinical research had the lowest self-efficacy in clinical research skills and students experiencing didactics plus mentored clinical research plus clinical research practicum had the highest perceived self-efficacy in clinical research domains. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This is one of the first studies assessing clinical research training methods for MD-PhD students and assessing their efficacy. We found that of all students questioned, 25% mentioned had not received any type of clinical research training. The remaining students identified 5 research training methods that institutions currently use. This work highlights the importance of clinical research experience students need to improve their self-efficacy, a major influence on research career outcomes.
机译:目标/特定目的:该研究旨在确定当前的MD-PhD计划临床研究培训干预措施以及它们在提高临床研究自我效能方面的有效性。方法/研究人群:2018年对MD-PhD受训者进行了全国调查,以确定临床研究培训方法和临床研究技能的自我效能。来自108个机构的MD-PhD计划主任和协调员被要求将调查问卷分发给他们的学生。从61个机构(56.5%)收到了答复。在所有培训期间,共有647名MD-PhD学生获得了答复,占代表的61所医学院校3613名可能参加者的17.9%。没有为这项研究提供任何补偿。结果/预期结果:学生报告的临床研究培训的主要方法包括:教学法,指导临床研究,教学法加上指导临床研究,教学法加上临床研究实践,以及教学法加上指导临床研究加上临床研究实践。所有参与者中有四分之一表示没有接受临床研究培训。然后,将临床研究的自我效能与临床研究培训的数量相关联。没有进行过临床研究的学生在临床研究技能方面的自我效能最低,而经历过教学法,有指导的临床研究以及临床研究实习的学生在临床研究领域具有最高的自我效能感。讨论/意义:这是评估MD-PhD学生临床研究培训方法并评估其疗效的首批研究之一。我们发现,在所有受到质疑的学生中,提到的25%的学生没有接受任何类型的临床研究培训。其余的学生确定了机构目前使用的5种研究培训方法。这项工作强调了临床研究经验的重要性,这些经验是学生提高自我效能所需的,这对研究职业的发展具有重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号