首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Dermatology Practical Conceptual >Melanocytic Skin Tumors: Genetic Aberrations and Clinicopathological Classification
【2h】

Melanocytic Skin Tumors: Genetic Aberrations and Clinicopathological Classification

机译:黑素细胞性皮肤肿瘤:遗传畸变和临床病理分类。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Melanocytic tumors are currently classified as , considered benign; , considered malignant; and , considered borderline tumors [ ]. However, recent studies on the genetic aberrations tend to make this classification problematic. In fact, the genomic analysis shows that both nevi and melanomas present mutations activating a certain number of growth-promoting signaling pathways. Tumors labeled as nevi and considered to be benign generally have a single or a small number of pathogenic mutations, often activating the MAP-kinase pathway ( ), but no apparent additional genomic alterations. Tumors labeled as melanomas and considered to be malignant may harbor the same driver mutations detected in those labeled nevi, associated with a variable, generally high, number of additional mutations tending to ablate tumor-suppression mechanisms and to activate additional oncogenic pathways, including , , , and -promoter mutations ( ). Tumors histologically regarded as problematic, sometimes termed or , harbor the same driver mutations detected in “nevi” and in “melanomas,” but a lower number of promoting mutations than “melanomas” [ – ]. The study of the distribution of pathogenic mutations has suggested they may occur in certain characteristic sequences [ ]. The initial event is often represented by a single mutation, which appears to be different in the different types of lesions: in common nevi; in some congenital and some acquired nevi; or in blue nevi; kinase fusions of , or in Spitz nevi; and kinase fusion of in spindle cell nevi of Reed [ , – ]. Moreover, in some -mutated neoplasms, more specific histological and biological characteristics may be produced by a supervening driver mutation, just as mutation in inactivated nevus, in deep penetrating nevus, and in epithelioid blue nevus/pigmented epithelioid melanocytoma [ – ]. Subsequently, other driver and/or promoting mutations may be progressively acquired, because driver mutations tend to induce an increase of cellular proliferation and, consequently, an increase of the probability that additional mutations occur. These supervened genomic aberrations may be ineffective or capable to alter, lightly or severely, a certain number of cell proliferation control mechanisms. If effective, they may lead to an additional enhancement of cell proliferation and, consequently, to an additional probability that other mutations take place, and so forth [ – ]. Therefore, in any given tumor, the total amount of the acquired mutations produces a certain risk of neoplastic progression, parallel to a certain risk of unfavorable events (recurrences, local and distant metastases, or death). This dual risk can be considered the of the tumor, definable as the probability that a certain number of adverse events may occur and directly proportional to the global pathogenic mutational burden. When genetic alterations are small in number, limited to the driver mutation or few more, this potential is low or very low, adverse events are rare or very rare, and, clinically, the tumor appears as benign. When genetic alterations are numerous, including driver and promoting mutations, the malignant potential is high, adverse events are frequent, and, clinically, the tumor appears as malignant. Of course, all intermediate cases may exist, because the malignant potential may theoretically assume every value between a minimum value (>0) and a maximum one (=100). The lowest possible value is >0, because all melanocytic tumors harbor at least 1 genomic alteration affecting the proliferation control mechanisms, and this inevitably implies a certain risk (risk 0 is to be reserved to the healthy skin, in which melanocytes harbor no pathogenic mutations). In sum, there do not seem to exist tumors with no chromosomal aberrations and consequently with no risk (risk = 0) and, at the same time, there seem to exist very few, if any, tumors harboring the of the possible chromosomal aberrations and, consequently, with the maximum possible risk (risk = 100). Tumors tend to show a certain variable number of pathogenic mutations and consequently may have all possible levels of risk, the malignant potential ranging between >0 and 100.
机译:黑素细胞瘤目前被分类为良性; ,被认为是恶性的;并且,被认为是交界性肿瘤[]。但是,最近关于遗传畸变的研究倾向于使这种分类成为问题。实际上,基因组分析表明,痣和黑色素瘤均存在激活一定数量促进生长的信号通路的突变。标记为痣且被认为是良性的肿瘤通常具有单个或少量的病原性突变,通常会激活MAP激酶途径(),但没有明显的其他基因组改变。标记为黑色素瘤且被认为是恶性的肿瘤可能具有在标记为痣的那些突变中检测到的相同驱动因子突变,通常伴随可变的,数量众多的附加突变,这些突变倾向于消除肿瘤抑制机制并激活其他致癌途径,包括、、和-启动子突变()。在组织学上被认为是有问题的肿瘤,有时被称为“或”,具有在“ nevi”和“黑色素瘤”中检测到的相同的驱动突变,但比“黑色素瘤” [–]少的促进突变。对致病突变分布的研究表明,它们可能以某些特征序列发生[]。初始事件通常由单个突变代表,这在不同类型的病变中似乎有所不同:常见的痣;在某些先天性和某些后天性痣中;或蓝色痣;或Spitz nevi中的激酶融合体; Reed [,–]的梭形细胞痣中的蛋白和激酶融合。此外,在某些突变的肿瘤中,超前的驱动突变可能会产生更具体的组织学和生物学特征,就像灭活痣,深穿透痣和上皮样蓝色痣/色素上皮样黑素细胞瘤[–]中的突变一样。随后,可以逐步获得其他驱动突变和/或促进突变,因为驱动突变倾向于诱导细胞增殖的增加,因此,增加了发生其他突变的可能性。这些超前的基因组畸变可能无效或轻微或严重改变一定数量的细胞增殖控制机制。如果有效,它们可能会导致细胞增殖的进一步增强,并因此导致发生其他突变的可能性更高,依此类推[–]。因此,在任何给定的肿瘤中,获得性突变的总量会产生一定程度的肿瘤进展风险,同时会产生不利事件(复发,局部和远处转移或死亡)的一定风险。这种双重风险可以认为是肿瘤的风险,可以定义为一定数量的不良事件可能发生的概率,并与总体致病突变负担成正比。当基因改变的数量少,仅限于驱动程序突变或更多时,这种可能性低或非常低,不良事件很少或非常少,并且在临床上,肿瘤表现为良性。当遗传改变很多,包括驱动突变和促进突变时,恶性潜力很高,不良事件频繁发生,并且在临床上,肿瘤表现为恶性。当然,可能存在所有中间情况,因为从理论上讲,恶性电势可以假定最小值(> 0)和最大值(= 100)之间的每个值。最低可能值> 0,因为所有黑素细胞肿瘤均具有至少1个影响增殖控制机制的基因组改变,并且这不可避免地暗示着一定的风险(风险0保留于健康皮肤,其中黑素细胞没有致病性突变)。总而言之,似乎不存在没有染色体畸变的肿瘤,因此没有风险(风险= 0),同时,似乎几乎没有(如果有的话)具有可能的染色体畸变和因此,具有最大可能的风险(风险= 100)。肿瘤倾向于表现出一定数量的致病突变,因此可能具有所有可能的风险水平,恶性潜能范围在> 0到100之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号