首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Translational Science >3552 Advancing Glioblastoma (GBM) drug regimen development to support combination therapy through integrated PKPD modeling and simulation-based predictions
【2h】

3552 Advancing Glioblastoma (GBM) drug regimen development to support combination therapy through integrated PKPD modeling and simulation-based predictions

机译:3552推进胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)药物方案开发以通过集成的PKPD建模和基于模拟的预测来支持联合治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Despite advancements in therapies, such as surgery, irradiation (IR) and chemotherapy, outcome for patients suffering from glioblastoma remains fatal; the median survival rate is only about 15 months. Even with novel therapeutic targets, networks and signaling pathways being discovered, monotherapy with such agents targeting such pathways has been disappointing in clinical trials. Poor prognosis for GBM can be attributed to several factors, including failure of drugs to cross the blood-brain-barrier (BBB), tumor heterogeneity, metastasis and angiogenesis. Development of tumor resistance, particularly to temozolomide (TMZ), creates a substantial clinical challenge.The primary focus of our work is to rationally develop novel combination therapies and dose regimens that mitigate resistance development. Specifically, our aim is to combine TMZ with small molecule inhibitors that are either currently in clinical trials or are approved drugs for other cancer types, and which target the disease at various resistance signaling pathways that are induced in response to TMZ monotherapy. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To accomplish this objective, an integrated PKPD modeling approach is used. The approach is largely based on the work of Cardilin, et al, 2018. A PK model for each drug is first defined. This is subsequently linked to a PD model description of tumor growth dynamics in the presence of a single drug or combinations of drugs. A key outcome of these combined PKPD models are tumor static concentration (TSC) curves of dual or triple combination drug regimens that identify combination drug exposures predicted to arrest tumor growth. This approach has been applied to TMZ in combination with abemaciclib (a dual CDK4/6 small molecule inhibitor) based on data from a published study evaluating abemaciclib efficacy in combination with TMZ in a glioblastoma xenograft model (Raub, et al, 2015). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A PKPD model was developed to predict tumor growth kinetics for TMZ and abemaciclib monotherapy, as well as combination therapy. Population PK models in immune deficient NSG mice for temozolomide and abemaciclib were developed based on data obtained from original and published studies. Subsequently, the PK model was linked to tumor volume data obtained from U87-MG GBM subcutaneous xenografts, again using both original data as well as data from the Raub, et al, 2015 study. Model parameters quantifying tumor volume dynamics were precisely estimated (coefficient of variation < 30%). The developed PKPD model was used to calculate plasma concentrations of TMZ and abemaciclib that would arrest tumor growth, as well as combinations of concentrations of the two drugs that would accomplish the same endpoint. This so-called TSC curve for the TMZ and abemaciclib combination pair evidenced an additive effect of the two agents when administered together. These results will be presented. In addition, results from on-going PKPD studies of TMZ in combination with two other small molecule inhibitors, RG7388, an MDM2 inhibitor, and GDC0068, an AKT inhibitor, will also be presented. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our long-term goals are to further elucidate SOC-induced responses in GBM and establish combination treatment regimens that are safe and significantly improve therapeutic efficacy. Collectively, our studies will broadly influence chemotherapy of GBM by establishing a process to rationally design combination approaches that mitigate resistance development. These studies will ultimately provide opportunities to study other targeted agents tailored to individual molecular signatures of GBM, as well as other tumor types.
机译:目的/特定目的:尽管在外科手术,放射线和化学疗法等疗法方面取得了进步,但胶质母细胞瘤患者的预后仍然是致命的。中位生存期仅为15个月左右。即使发现了新的治疗靶标,网络和信号通路,在临床试验中用靶向这类通路的这类药物进行单药治疗也令人失望。 GBM的预后不良可归因于多种因素,包括药物无法通过血脑屏障(BBB),肿瘤异质性,转移和血管生成。肿瘤耐药性的发展,特别是对替莫唑胺(TMZ)的耐药性,提出了巨大的临床挑战。我们工作的主要重点是合理开发减轻耐药性发展的新型联合疗法和剂量方案。具体来说,我们的目标是将TMZ与目前正在临床试验中或被批准用于其他癌症类型的小分子抑制剂相结合,并将这些疾病靶向针对响应TMZ单一疗法而诱发的各种耐药信号通路。方法/研究人群:为了实现这一目标,使用了集成的PKPD建模方法。该方法主要基于Cardilin等人的工作(2018年)。首先定义每种药物的PK模型。随后将其与在单一药物或药物组合存在下肿瘤生长动力学的PD模型描述联系起来。这些组合的PKPD模型的关键结果是双重或三次联合药物治疗方案的肿瘤静态浓度(TSC)曲线,该曲线可识别预计会阻止肿瘤生长的联合药物暴露。基于已发表的评估胶体母细胞瘤异种移植模型中abemaciclib与TMZ结合的功效的公开研究数据,该方法已与abemaciclib(双重CDK4 / 6小分子抑制剂)联合应用到TMZ(Raub等,2015)。结果/预期结果:开发了PKPD模型来预测TMZ和abemaciclib单药治疗以及联合治疗的肿瘤生长动力学。基于原始研究和已发表研究的数据,开发了替莫唑胺和abemaciclib免疫缺陷的NSG小鼠的种群PK模型。随后,将PK模型与从U87-MG GBM皮下异种移植获得的肿瘤体积数据相关联,再次使用原始数据以及Raub等人(2015年)研究的数据。精确估计量化肿瘤体积动态的模型参数(变异系数<30%)。开发的PKPD模型用于计算将阻止肿瘤生长的TMZ和abemaciclib的血浆浓度,以及将完成相同终点的两种药物的浓度组合。这对TMZ和abemaciclib组合对的TSC曲线证明了两种药物一起给药时的加和作用。将显示这些结果。此外,还将提供正在进行的TMZ PKPD研究与另外两种小分子抑制剂RG7388(一种MDM2抑制剂)和GDC0068(一种AKT抑制剂)组合的结果。讨论/意义的探讨:我们的长期目标是进一步阐明SOC诱发的GBM反应,并建立安全有效的组合治疗方案并显着提高治疗效果。总体而言,我们的研究将通过建立合理设计减轻耐药性发展的联合方法的过程,广泛地影响GBM的化疗。这些研究最终将为研究针对GBM的单个分子标记以及其他肿瘤类型量身定制的其他靶向药物提供机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号