首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Medical Education Journal >Ten ways to get a grip on resident co-production within medical education change
【2h】

Ten ways to get a grip on resident co-production within medical education change

机译:掌握医学教育变革中的居民共同生产的十种方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) is transforming its national approach to postgraduate medical education by transitioning all specialty programs to competency based medical education (CBME) curriculums over a seven-year period. Queen’s University, with special permission from the RCPSC, launched CBME curricula for all incoming residents across its 29 specialty programs in July 2017. Resident engagement, empowerment, and co-production through this transition has been instrumental in successful implementation of CBME at Queen’s University. This article aims to use our own experience at Queen’s in the context of current literature and rooted in change leadership theory, to provide a guide for educators, learners, and institutions on how to leverage the interest and enthusiasm of trainees in the transition to CBME in postgraduate training. The following ten tips provides a model for avoiding the “black ice” type pitfalls that can arise with learner involvement and ensure a smoother transition for other institutions moving forward with CBME implementation.
机译:加拿大皇家内科医生与外科医学院(RCPSC)正在通过将所有专业计划过渡到基于能力的医学教育(CBME)课程的方式,在七年的时间里改变其研究生医学教育的国家方法。女王大学在RCPSC的特别许可下,于2017年7月在其29个专业计划中为所有即将入学的居民开设了CBME课程。通过这一过渡,居民的参与,赋权和联合制作为成功实施女王大学的CBME提供了帮助。本文旨在利用我们在皇后大学现有文献中的经验并植根于变革领导理论,为教育者,学习者和机构提供指南,指导他们如何利用受训者的兴趣和热情过渡到CBME。研究生培训。以下十个技巧提供了一个模型,可以避免因学习者参与而产生的“黑冰”式陷阱,并确保其他机构在实施CBME的过程中能更顺利地过渡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号