首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry >Kraepelin’s views on obsessive neurosis: a comparison with DSM-5 criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder
【2h】

Kraepelin’s views on obsessive neurosis: a comparison with DSM-5 criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder

机译:Kraepelin对强迫症的看法:与DSM-5强迫症的标准比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926) is considered one of the founders of modern psychiatric nosology. However, his conceptualization of obsessive-compulsive phenomena is relatively understudied. In this article, we compare and contrast excerpts from the eighth edition (1909-1915) of Kraepelin’s Textbook of Clinical Psychiatry focusing on what Kraepelin called “obsessive neurosis” and related “original pathological conditions” with the current DSM-5 criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Consistently with DSM-5 OCD, Kraepelin described obsessive neurosis as characterized by obsessive ideas, compulsive acts, or both together. His detailed descriptions of these symptoms are broadly coherent with their characterization in DSM-5, which is also true for the differential diagnoses he provided. He also mentioned cases illustrating decreased insight into symptoms and association with tic disorders. In conclusion, Kraepelin’s experience, which reflects decades of consistent clinical work, may help validate current ideas and explain how the current conceptualization has emerged and developed. Even though one can hardly say that the classification laid out in DSM-5 goes back to Kraepelin’s views directly, it still is true that Kraepelin played an outstanding role in systematizing psychiatric diagnostic criteria in general, and provided a major contribution to the conceptual history of OCD.
机译:埃米尔·克莱佩林(Emil Kraepelin,1856-1926年)被认为是现代精神病学的奠基人之一。但是,他对强迫症的概念化研究相对较少。在本文中,我们将Kraepelin的《临床精神病学教科书》第八版(1909-1915)的摘录进行比较和对比,侧重于Kraepelin所说的“强迫症神经症”和相关的“原始病理状况”,以及当前针对强迫症的DSM-5标准强迫症(OCD)。与DSM-5 OCD一致,Kraepelin将强迫症描述为强迫观念,强迫行为或两者兼有。他对这些症状的详细描述与其在DSM-5中的表征大致相符,对于他提供的鉴别诊断也是如此。他还提到了一些病例,这些病例说明对症状的了解和与抽动障碍的关联减少。总之,Kraepelin的经验反映了数十年来的持续临床工作,可能有助于验证当前的想法并解释当前的概念化是如何产生和发展的。尽管几乎不能说DSM-5中列出的分类直接追溯到Kraepelin的观点,但的确是,Kraepelin在总体上将精神病学诊断标准系统化方面发挥了杰出的作用,并为Klepelin的概念史做出了重大贡献强迫症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号