首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences >THE EFFICACY OF SUPPLEMENTAL INTRAOSSEOUS ANESTHESIA AFTER INSUFFICIENT MANDIBULAR BLOCK
【2h】

THE EFFICACY OF SUPPLEMENTAL INTRAOSSEOUS ANESTHESIA AFTER INSUFFICIENT MANDIBULAR BLOCK

机译:下颌骨块不足后进行补充性骨内麻醉的疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is a well-known scientific fact that only a small percentage of infiltration of inferior alveolar nerve is clinically proven to be efficient. The objective of this study was to determine the anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraosseous injection, used after the insufficient classical mandibular block that didn’t provide deep pulp anesthesia of mandibular molar planed for extraction. The experimental teeth consisted of 98 mandibular molars with clinical indication for extraction. Based on the history of disease, we indicated the extraction of the tooth. After that each tooth was tested with a electric pulp tester Pi. We tested the pulp vitality and precisely determined the level of vitality. After that, each patient received classical mandibular block, and the pulp vitality was tested again. If the pulp tester indicated negative vitality for the certain mandibular molar, and the patient didn’t complain about pain or discomfort during the extraction, the molar was extracted and the result was added to anesthetic success rate for the classical mandibular block. If, five minutes after receiving the mandibular block, the pulp tester indicated positive vitality (parameters of vitality) or the patient complained about pain or discomfort (parameters of pain and discomfort), we used the Stabiden intraosseous anesthesia system. Three minutes after the application of supplemental intraosseous injection the molar was tested with the pulp tester again. The anesthetic solution used in both anesthetic techniques is lidocaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine. The results of this study indicate that the anesthetic efficacy of the mandibular block is 74.5%, and that supplemental intraosseeous anesthesia, applied after the insufficient mandibular block, provides pulpal anesthesia in 94.9% of mandibular molars. The difference between anesthetic efficacy of the classical mandibular block and anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseeous anesthesia, applied after the insufficient mandibular block, is obvious.
机译:众所周知的科学事实是,仅小部分的下牙槽神经浸润在临床上被证明是有效的。这项研究的目的是确定补充性骨内注射的麻醉效果,该注射用于经典的下颌骨阻滞不足,不能为计划的下颌磨牙提供深髓麻醉。实验牙齿由98颗下颌磨牙组成,具有拔牙的临床适应症。根据疾病史,我们指出了拔牙的方法。之后,用电动纸浆测试仪Pi对每个牙齿进行测试。我们测试了纸浆活力,并精确确定了活力水平。之后,每位患者均接受经典的下颌骨阻滞,并再次测试牙髓活力。如果牙髓测试仪显示该下颌磨牙的生命力为负值,并且患者在拔牙过程中没有抱怨疼痛或不适,则可以取出磨牙,并将结果添加到经典下颌阻滞的麻醉成功率上。如果在接受下颌阻滞五分钟后,牙髓测试仪显示出积极的生命力(生命力参数)或患者抱怨疼痛或不适(疼痛和不适感参数),我们使用了Stabiden骨内麻醉系统。补充骨内注射三分钟后,再次用牙髓测试仪测试磨牙。两种麻醉技术中使用的麻醉溶液是利多卡因和1:100.000肾上腺素。这项研究的结果表明,下颌阻滞的麻醉效率为74.5%,而在下颌阻滞不足后进行的补充骨内麻醉可在94.9%的下颌磨牙中提供牙髓麻醉。在下颌骨不足的情况下,经典下颌骨的麻醉功效与补充骨内麻醉的麻醉功效之间存在明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号