首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Genomics >Equivalent change enrichment analysis: assessing equivalent and inverse change in biological pathways between diverse experiments
【2h】

Equivalent change enrichment analysis: assessing equivalent and inverse change in biological pathways between diverse experiments

机译:等效变化富集分析:评估不同实验之间生物学途径的等效和逆向变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The proportion of equivalently changed pathways detected by each method, when the probability of equivalent change was 0.5. The x-axis displays the symmetry, which shows the probability of genes being up-regulated in the pathway as opposed to down-regulated (when they were differentially expressed). With a symmetry of 0.5, approximately half of the differentially expressed genes would be up-regulated and the rest would be down-regulated. The different lines show the sensitivity for different levels of probability of a gene being differentially expressed. The results are shown for (A) ECEA, (B) GSEA, and (C) ORA. For nearly all levels of probability of differential expression, ECEA was more sensitive than ORA. ECEA was also more sensitive than GSEA whenever the genes were not highly co-expressed (symmetry near .1 or .9)
机译:当等效变化的概率为0.5时,每种方法检测到的等效变化路径的比例。 x轴显示对称性,对称性显示基因在途径中被上调而不是被下调(差异表达时)的可能性。对称性为0.5时,大约一半的差异表达基因将被上调,其余基因将被下调。不同的线显示了基因差异表达的不同概率水平的敏感性。显示了(A)ECEA,(B)GSEA和(C)ORA的结果。对于几乎所有水平的差异表达可能性,ECEA比ORA更为敏感。每当基因未高度共表达时(对称性接近.1或.9),ECEA也会比GSEA敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号