首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Translational Science >Engaging patients throughout the health system: A landscape analysis of cold-call policies and recommendations for future policy change
【2h】

Engaging patients throughout the health system: A landscape analysis of cold-call policies and recommendations for future policy change

机译:在整个卫生系统中吸引患者参与:冷呼政策的态势分析和未来政策变更的建议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Healthcare institutions may often prohibit “cold-calling” or direct contact with a potential research participant when the person initiating contact is unknown to the patient. This policy aims to maintain patient privacy, but may have unintended consequences as a result of physician gatekeeping. In this review, we discuss recruitment policies at the top academic institutions. We propose an ethical framework for evaluating cold-call policies based on three principles of research ethics. In order to maximize engagement of potential research participants, while maintaining patient privacy and autonomy, we then propose several alternative solutions to restrictive cold-call policies, including opt-in or opt-out platforms, a team-based approach, electronic solutions, and best practices for recruitment. As healthcare has evolved with more collaborative, patient-centered, data-driven care, the engagement of potential research participants should similarly evolve.
机译:当患者不知道发起接触的人时,医疗机构通常会禁止“冷打”或直接与潜在的研究参与者接触。该政策旨在维护患者的隐私,但可能会由于医生的关门而产生意想不到的后果。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了顶级学术机构的招聘政策。我们基于研究伦理学的三个原则,提出了一个评估冷待命政策的伦理学框架。为了最大程度地提高潜在研究参与者的参与度,同时保持患者的隐私和自主权,我们随后提出了一些限制性冷呼叫政策的替代解决方案,包括选择加入或退出平台,基于团队的方法,电子解决方案以及招聘的最佳做法。随着医疗保健以更具协作性,以患者为中心,以数据为驱动的医疗服务的发展而发展,潜在研究参与者的参与也应类似地发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号