首页> 外文会议>eceee summer study on energy efficiency;European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy >Are current policies promoting a change in behaviour, conservation and sufficiency? An analysis of existing policies and recommendations for new and effective policies
【24h】

Are current policies promoting a change in behaviour, conservation and sufficiency? An analysis of existing policies and recommendations for new and effective policies

机译:当前的政策是否在促进行为,养护和自给的改变?对现有政策的分析以及对新的有效政策的建议

获取原文

摘要

There is a strong consent that reducing or capping global energy demand is a key component to reach ambitious climate targets together with the de-carbonisation of energy production. The EU 2020 and the 2030 energy efficiency targets are expressed as a maximum consumption level. Given the nature and magnitude of these targets, a change of energy consumer behaviour is required in order to deliver the requested energy reduction. Traditionally many energy efficiency policies have targeted and promoted efficient technologies (e.g. appliances standards or prescriptive insulation levels or building energy performance standards), which do not always guarantee energy savings (e.g. larger appliances, larger new buildings) and/or are not enough to reach the ambitious energy and climate targets. To the contrary some policies may have even incentivised larger energy consumption than necessary (e.g. some appliances standards which are easily met by larger appliances).Policies are needed to influence consumer behaviour and lifestyle and the concept of sufficiency has to be introduced in future energy efficiency policy design. Policies targeting sufficiency should discourage increased energy use due to a variety of factors such as increased floor space, increased comfort levels beyond what reasonable, increased number and larger appliances/equipment/cars and increased usage of energy consuming equipment.Policy instruments that may target sufficiency includes: personal carbon trading (i.e. carbon markets with equitable personal allocations); property/car taxation (e.g. related to a building’s CO_2 emissions); energy taxation; progressive appliance and cars standards, and building codes, including absolute consumption limits (kWh/person/year) rather than efficiency requirements (kWh/m~2/year).The present paper reviews the concept of energy saving compared to energy efficiency. It identifies existing energy efficiency policies that may induce higher energy consumption, and finally discusses and analyses “new” energy efficiency policies, which may encourage sufficiency and a behavioural/lifestyle change, with focus on the residential sector. The paper gives recommendations on how to promote behaviour change through innovative policies and packages of policies and how to prevent increased energy consumption.
机译:人们强烈同意,减少或限制全球能源需求是实现雄心勃勃的气候目标以及能源生产脱碳的关键组成部分。欧盟2020年和2030年的能效目标表示为最大消耗水平。考虑到这些目标的性质和规模,需要改变能耗户的行为,以实现所要求的节能措施。传统上,许多节能政策都针对和推广了高效技术(例如,设备标准或规定的隔热等级或建筑能源性能标准),这些技术并不总是保证节能(例如,更大的设备,更大的新建筑)和/或不足以达到目标雄心勃勃的能源和气候目标。相反,某些政策甚至可能激发比必要更大的能源消耗(例如,大型家电容易满足的某些家电标准)。 需要制定政策来影响消费者的行为和生活方式,并且在未来的能效政策设计中必须引入充足性的概念。由于各种因素,例如充足的地板空间,超出合理范围的舒适度,增加的数量和更大的电器/设备/汽车以及增加的耗能设备使用率,针对充足性的政策应不鼓励更多的能源使用。 可能以自给自足为目标的政策工具包括:个人碳交易(即具有公平个人配置的碳市场);财产/汽车税(例如,与建筑物的CO_2排放量有关);能源税收;渐进的家用电器和汽车标准以及建筑规范,包括绝对能耗限制(kWh /人/年),而不是效率要求(kWh / m〜2 /年)。 本文回顾了与节能相比的节能概念。它确定了可能导致更高能耗的现有能效政策,并最终讨论和分析了“新”能效政策,这些政策可能鼓励自给自足和行为/生活方式的改变,重点是住宅领域。本文就如何通过创新性政策和一揽子政策促进行为改变以及如何防止能源消耗增加提出了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号