首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antibiotics >Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Combination Versus Meropenem for Treating Nosocomial Pneumonia
【2h】

Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Combination Versus Meropenem for Treating Nosocomial Pneumonia

机译:新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶联合美罗培南治疗院内肺炎

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study reports the integrated analysis of two phase III studies of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combination versus meropenem for treating nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The ASPECT-NP trial compared the efficacy and safety of ceftolozane–tazobactam versus meropenem for treating NP/VAP. The REPROVE trial compared ceftazidime–avibactam and meropenem in the treatment of NP/VAP. A total of 1528 patients (361 in the ceftolozane–tazobactam group; 405 in the ceftazidime–avibactam group; 762 in the meropenem group) were analyzed. The clinical cure rates at test-of-cure among the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations group were non-inferior to those of the meropenem (70.7% vs. 72.1%, risk difference (RD) −0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06–0.05) in the clinical evaluable populations. Overall 28-day mortality did not differ between novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations and the meropenem group (RD, −0.02, 95% CI, −0.09 to 0.05). Regarding the microbiological eradication rate, novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations were non-inferior to meropenem for , , , , , and . Finally, novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations had a similar risk of (i) treatment-emergent adverse events (RD, 0.02, 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.06), (ii) events leading to the discontinuation of the study drug (RD, 0.00, 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.03), (iii) severe adverse events (RD, 0.03, 95% CI, −0.01 to 0.07), and (iv) death (RD, 0.02, 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.05) when compared with meropenem group. In conclusion, our findings suggest that novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations of ceftolozane−tazobactam and ceftazidime–avibactam can be recommended as one of the therapeutic options in the treatment of NP/VAP.
机译:这项研究报告了新的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶联合美罗培南用于治疗包括呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)在内的医院内肺炎(NP)的两项III期研究的综合分析。 ASPECT-NP试验比较了头孢洛氮-他唑巴坦和美罗培南治疗NP / VAP的疗效和安全性。 REPROVE试验比较了头孢他啶-avibactam和美罗培南在NP / VAP的治疗中。总共分析了1528例患者(头孢洛z-他唑巴坦组361例;头孢他啶-avibactam组405例;美罗培南组762例)。新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶联合治疗组的治愈率不低于美洛培南(70.7%vs. 72.1%,风险差异(RD)-0.01,95%置信度)在临床可评估人群中的区间(CI)0.06–0.05)。新的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶组合与美洛培南组之间的28天总死亡率无差异(RD,-0.02,95%CI,-0.09至0.05)。关于微生物的根除率,新颖的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶组合在、、、、和中均不亚于美罗培南。最后,新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶组合具有类似的风险:(i)出现治疗性不良事件(RD,0.02、95%CI,-0.02至0.06),(ii)导致研究中断的事件药物(RD,0.00,95%CI,-0.02至0.03),(iii)严重不良事件(RD,0.03,95%CI,-0.01至0.07),(iv)死亡(RD,0.02,95%CI ,-0.02至0.05)与美罗培南组相比。总之,我们的发现表明,头孢唑烷-他唑巴坦和头孢他啶-avibactam的新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶组合可被推荐作为NP / VAP的治疗选择之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号