首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Urology >Feasibility complication and long-term follow-up of the newly nelaton based urethral dilation method retrospective study
【2h】

Feasibility complication and long-term follow-up of the newly nelaton based urethral dilation method retrospective study

机译:新的基于Nelaton的尿道扩张方法的可行性并发症和长期随访回顾性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Current methods for Urethral dilatation include filiforms and followers, metal sounds, balloon dilators, catheters of increasing size, introduction of a Council catheter over a guidewire, and coaxial dilators of increasing size. These methods however are effective but expensive and use of them is limited in many third world countries. In this retrospective study, we report the feasibility, complication and long-term follow-up of the newly Nelaton based urethral dilation method following by self calibration plan as a single referral center experience. We reviewed the records of 333 men with urethral stricture longer than 1 cm over a 16-year period between March 2001 to December 2018. In this method the straight flexi-tip guide-wire is introduced through the urethra and advanced under cystoscopic vision. This wire then was used to guide the dilatation after withdrawal of the cystoscope. The tip of well-lubricated Nelaton urethral catheters incised and then advanced gently over the guide-wire serially from the smallest to the largest appropriate sizes. The patients were followed up regularly after the dilatation 1, 3, 6, 12 months and then annually postoperatively with taking history, PVR and uroflowmetry and all underwent retrograde urethrography at the 6 and 12 months of follow-up. The mean age of patients was 39.19±16.9 years old (10 to 86 years). The mean period of the follow-up was 3.6±1.1 years (range, 3 to 4.3 years). Success rate after first attempted was 58.5% and after two attempted was 77.7% in two years follow up. After one year 51 (15.3%), two years 23 (6.9%) and after three years 11 (3.3%) cases required continued self dilatation once a month. Guide wire-assisted urethral dilatation is shown to be acceptable, cost-effective, simple, safe and feasible techniques for urethral dilation. Our technique may be the choice manner in selected patients with short memberanous urethral stricture, because of decrease the risk of incontinency.
机译:当前的用于尿道扩张的方法包括丝状和从动,金属音,球囊扩张器,尺寸增大的导管,在导丝上引入Council导管,以及尺寸增大的同轴扩张器。然而,这些方法有效但昂贵,并且在许多第三世界国家中对其使用受到限制。在这项回顾性研究中,我们报告了基于自我校准计划的,基于Nelaton的新的基于Nelaton的尿道扩张方法的可行性,并发症和长期随访,作为单一的推荐中心经验。我们回顾了2001年3月至2018年12月的16年中333例尿道狭窄长度超过1厘米的男性的记录。采用这种方法,笔直的尖端导丝通过尿道引入并在膀胱镜检查下前进。然后,将这根线用于在膀胱镜撤回后引导扩张。将润滑良好的Nelaton尿道导管的尖端切开,然后在导丝上从合适的最小尺寸到最大尺寸依次顺次推进。扩张期1、3、6、12个月后对患者进行定期随访,然后每年进行术后随访,并有病史,PVR和尿流测定法,并在随访的6个月和12个月内全部接受逆行尿道造影。患者的平均年龄为39.19±16.9岁(10至86岁)。随访的平均时间为3.6±1。1年(范围3至4。3年)。在两年的随访中,首次尝试后的成功率为58.5%,两次尝试后的成功率为77.7%。一年后51(15.3%),两年后23(6.9%),三年后11(3.3%),每个月需要继续自我扩张。导丝辅助尿道扩张术被证明是可接受的,经济有效的,简单,安全和可行的尿道扩张术。由于尿失禁的风险降低,我们的技术可能是选择的部分短尿道狭窄患者的选择方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号