首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >What Happened to Long-Term Care in the Health Reform Debate of 1993–1994? Lessons for the Future
【2h】

What Happened to Long-Term Care in the Health Reform Debate of 1993–1994? Lessons for the Future

机译:在1993-1994年的医疗改革辩论中长期护理发生了什么?未来的教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

During 1993 and 1994, the United States debated but did not enact major health care reform. Although the reform efforts focused on providing health coverage for the uninsured and controlling acute care costs, many proposals included substantial long-term care initiatives. President Clinton proposed creating a large home-care program for severely disabled people of all ages and all income groups, among several other initiatives. By stressing non-means-tested public programs, the president's plan was a major departure from the Medicaid-dominated financing system for long-term care. In designing the long-term care component, the Clinton administration addressed many of the basic policy choices that must be decided in all reform efforts, including whether initiatives should be limited to older people or cover people of any age, how to balance institutional and noninstitutional care, whether to rely on government programs or on the private sector, and how to control costs. Analyzing the political and intellectual history of long-term care during the health reform debate provides lessons for future reform.
机译:在1993年至1994年期间,美国进行了辩论,但没有实施重大的医疗保健改革。尽管改革工作的重点是为没有保险的人提供医疗保险并控制急症护理费用,但许多建议都包括大量的长期护理计划。克林顿总统提议制定一项针对所有年龄段和所有收入群体的严重残疾人的大型家庭护理计划,以及其他一些举措。通过强调未经过经济审查的公共计划,总统的计划与以医疗补助为主导的长期护理筹资系统大相径庭。在设计长期护理部分时,克林顿政府解决了所有改革工作中必须决定的许多基本政策选择,包括倡议是否应仅限于老年人还是涵盖任何年龄的人,如何在机构和非机构之间取得平衡无论是依靠政府计划还是依靠私营部门,以及如何控制成本。在卫生改革辩论中分析长期护理的政治和思想史,为未来的改革提供了经验教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号