首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparing electronic-keypad responses to paper-and-pencil questionnaires in group assessments of alcohol consumption and related attitudes
【2h】

Comparing electronic-keypad responses to paper-and-pencil questionnaires in group assessments of alcohol consumption and related attitudes

机译:在小组评估酒精消耗和相关态度时比较电子键盘对纸质铅笔问卷的反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Electronic versions of questionnaires have the potential to improve research and interventions in the addictions. Administering questionnaires electronically to groups, however, has proven difficult without a multitude of computers, but gathering data electronically from a group could make for easy assessment and quick feedback. Using a sample of 107 college students, we examined the validity of wireless keypad survey responses by comparing them to traditional paper-and-pencil questionnaires. The two formats led to almost identical responses that did not differ significantly from each other (all effect sizes less than g =.15) and high correlations between formats. The wireless, handheld keypad procedure appears to generate data that are as valid as questionnaire responses and permit rapid feedback to groups, as well as easy, human error-free data entry for analysis.
机译:电子版的问卷有潜力改善对成瘾的研究和干预。然而,事实证明,如果没有大量的计算机,以电子方式对小组进行问卷调查是很困难的,但是从小组以电子方式收集数据可以使评估和快速反馈变得容易。我们以107名大学生为样本,通过将无线键盘调查答复与传统的纸质铅笔调查问卷进行比较,检验了其有效性。两种格式导致几乎相同的响应,彼此之间没有显着差异(所有效果大小均小于g = .15),并且格式之间具有高度相关性。无线手持式键盘程序似乎可以生成与问卷调查表一样有效的数据,并可以快速将信息反馈给各组,并且可以轻松,无人为错误地输入数据进行分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号