首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Exploring the Interaction of Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Complexes with DNA Using Single-Molecule Techniques
【2h】

Exploring the Interaction of Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Complexes with DNA Using Single-Molecule Techniques

机译:用单分子技术探索钌(Ⅱ)多吡啶基配合物与DNA的相互作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Here we explore DNA binding by a family of ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes using an atomic force microscope (AFM) and optical tweezers. We demonstrate using AFM that Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ intercalates into DNA (Kb= 1.5 × 105 M−1), as does its close relative Ru(bpy)2dppx2+ (Kb= 1.5 × 105 M−1). However, intercalation by Ru(phen)32+ and other Ru(II) complexes with Kb's lower than Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ are difficult to determine using AFM because of competing aggregation and surface-binding phenomena. At the high Ru(II) concentrations required to evaluate intercalation, most of the DNA strands acquire a twisted, curled conformation that is impossible to measure accurately. The condensation of DNA on mica in the presence of polycations is well known, but it clearly precludes the accurate assessment by AFM of DNA intercalation by most Ru(II) complexes, though not by ethidium bromide and other monovalent intercalators. When stretching individual DNA molecules using optical tweezers the same limitation on high metal concentration does not exist. Using optical tweezers we show that Ru(phen)2dppz2+ intercalates avidly (Kb = 3.2 × 106 M−1) while Ru(bpy)32+ does not intercalate, even at micromolar ruthenium concentrations. Ru(phen)32+ is shown to intercalate weakly, i.e. at micromolar concentrations (Kb= 8.8 × 103 M−1). The distinct differences in DNA stretching behavior between Ru(phen)32+ and Ru(bpy)32+ clearly illustrate that intercalation can be distinguished from groove binding by pulling the DNA with optical tweezers. Our results demonstrate both the benefits and challenges of two single-molecule methods in exploring DNA binding, and help to elucidate the mode of binding of Ru(phen)32+.
机译:在这里,我们使用原子力显微镜(AFM)和光学镊子探索钌(II)聚吡啶基复合物家族的DNA结合。我们使用原子力显微镜证明Ru(bpy)2dppz 2 + 嵌入到DNA(Kb = 1.5×10 5 M -1 )中其近亲Ru(bpy)2dppx 2 + (Kb = 1.5×10 5 M -1 )。但是,使用AFM难以确定Ru(phen)3 2 + 和Kb低于Ru(bpy)2dppz 2 + 的其他Ru(II)配合物的嵌入,因为使用AFM很难确定竞争性聚集和表面结合现象。在评估嵌入所需的高Ru(II)浓度下,大多数DNA链会获得无法精确测量的扭曲卷曲特征。在聚阳离子存在下,DNA在云母上的缩合是众所周知的,但它显然排除了大多数Ru(II)配合物通过AFM对DNA嵌入进行准确评估的可能性,尽管溴化乙锭和其他单价嵌入剂没有进行这种评估。当使用光镊拉伸单个DNA分子时,对高金属浓度没有相同的限制。使用光镊我们显示Ru(phen)2dppz 2 + 插入(Kb = 3.2×10 6 M -1 ),而Ru( bpy)3 2 + 甚至在微摩尔钌浓度下也不会插入。 Ru(phen)3 2 + 表现为微弱插层,即在微摩尔浓度(Kb = 8.8×10 3 M -1 )上。 Ru(phen)3 2 + 和Ru(bpy)3 2 + 在DNA拉伸行为上的明显差异清楚地表明,通过拉动嵌缝可以将嵌缝与凹槽结合区分开带有镊子的DNA。我们的结果证明了两种单分子方法在探索DNA结合中的益处和挑战,并有助于阐明Ru(phen)3 2 + 的结合方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号