首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF A METHOD TO STUDY KINEMATICS OF THE TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT: COMBINATION OF MOTION DATA AND CT IMAGING
【2h】

ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF A METHOD TO STUDY KINEMATICS OF THE TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT: COMBINATION OF MOTION DATA AND CT IMAGING

机译:运动学和颞下颌关节运动学方法的准确性和精确性:运动数据和CT成像的结合

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of the study was to test the precision and accuracy of a method used to track selected landmarks during motion of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). A precision phantom device was constructed and relative motions between two rigid bodies on the phantom device were measured using optoelectronic (OE) and electromagnetic (EM) motion tracking devices. The motion recordings were also combined with a 3D CT image for each type of motion tracking system (EM+CT and OE+CT) to mimic methods used in previous studies. In the OE and EM data collections, specific landmarks on the rigid bodies were determined using digitization. In the EM+CT and OE+CT data sets, the landmark locations were obtained from the CT images. 3D linear distances and 3D curvilinear path distances were calculated for the points. The accuracy and precision for all 4 methods were evaluated (EM, OE, EM+CT and OE+CT). In addition, results were compared with and without the CT imaging (EM vs. EM+CT, OE vs. OE+CT). All systems overestimated the actual 3D curvilinear path lengths. All systems also underestimated the actual rotation values. The accuracy of all methods was within 0.5 mm for 3D curvilinear path calculations, 0.05 mm for 3D linear distance calculations, and 0.2° for rotation calculations. In addition, Bland-Altman plots for each configuration of the systems suggest that measurements obtained from either system are repeatable and comparable.
机译:这项研究的目的是测试在颞下颌关节(TMJ)运动过程中用于跟踪选定路标的方法的准确性和准确性。构造了精密的幻影设备,并使用光电(OE)和电磁(EM)运动跟踪设备测量了幻影设备上两个刚体之间的相对运动。运动记录还与每种运动跟踪系统(EM + CT和OE + CT)的3D CT图像相结合,以模仿先前研究中使用的方法。在OE和EM数据收集中,使用数字化确定刚体上的特定界标。在EM + CT和OE + CT数据集中,界标位置是从CT图像获得的。计算这些点的3D线性距离和3D曲线路径距离。评估了所有4种方法(EM,OE,EM + CT和OE + CT)的准确性和精密度。此外,比较了有无CT成像的结果(EM与EM + CT,OE与OE + CT)。所有系统都高估了实际的3D曲线路径长度。所有系统还低估了实际的旋转值。对于3D曲线路径计算,所有方法的精度均在0.5 mm以内,对于3D线性距离计算而言,所有方法的精度均在0.05 mm之内,而对于旋转计算而言,其精度为0.2°。另外,针对每种系统配置的Bland-Altman图表明,从这两种系统获得的测量结果都是可重复且可比较的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号