首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Partial Nephrectomy vs. Radical Nephrectomy in Patients With Small Renal Tumors: Is There a Difference in Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes?
【2h】

Partial Nephrectomy vs. Radical Nephrectomy in Patients With Small Renal Tumors: Is There a Difference in Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes?

机译:肾小肿瘤患者部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术:死亡率和心血管结局是否存在差异?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PurposeRadical nephrectomy (RN), compared with partial nephrectomy (PN), increases the risk of chronic kidney disease, a significant risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) events and death. Given equivalent oncologic efficacy in patients with small renal tumors (RTs), RN may result in overtreatment. We analyzed a population-based cohort of patients to determine if RN is associated with an increase in CV events and mortality compared with PN.
机译:目的与部分肾切除术(PN)相比,根治性肾切除术(RN)增加了慢性肾脏疾病的风险,而慢性肾脏疾病是心血管(CV)事件和死亡的重要危险因素。鉴于小肾脏肿瘤(RTs)患者具有等效的肿瘤学疗效,RN可能会导致过度治疗。我们分析了一个以人群为基础的患者队列,以确定RN与PN相比是否与CV事件和死亡率增加有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号