首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on early identification of reading disabilities
【2h】

Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on early identification of reading disabilities

机译:普遍筛查的地面效应及其对阅读障碍的早期识别的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Response to intervention (RTI) holds great promise for the early identification and prevention of reading disabilities. The success of RTI rests in part on the accuracy of universal screening tools used within this framework. Despite advancements, screening instruments designed to identify children at risk for reading disabilities continue to have limited predictive validity. In this study, we examine a common screening instrument for the presence of floor effects and investigate the impact that these effects have on the predictive validity of the instrument. Longitudinal data (kindergarten-3rd grade) from a large cohort of children were used. These data included children’s performances on five measures from DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills) and two reading achievement outcome measures. Results showed that DIBELS measures were characterized by floor effects in their initial administrations, and that these effects reduced the predictive validity of the measures. The implications of these findings for early identification are discussed.
机译:对干预的反应(RTI)对于早期识别和预防阅读障碍具有广阔的前景。 RTI的成功部分取决于在此框架内使用的通用筛选工具的准确性。尽管取得了进步,但旨在识别有阅读障碍风险的儿童的筛查工具的预测有效性仍然有限。在这项研究中,我们检查了常见的筛查工具是否存在地板效应,并研究了这些效应对仪器的预测有效性的影响。使用来自一大批儿童的纵向数据(kindergarten-3 rd 年级)。这些数据包括儿童通过DIBELS(基本早期识字技能的动态指标)的五项指标和两项阅读成绩结果指标所取得的成绩。结果表明,DIBELS措施在初次给药时具有地板效应,这些效应降低了该措施的预测有效性。讨论了这些发现对早期识别的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号